Investment without Democracy : Ruling-Party Institutionalization and Credible Commitment in Autocracies
What explains private investment in autocracies, where institutions that discourage expropriation in democracies are absent? We argue that institutionalized ruling parties allow autocrats to make credible commitments to investors. Such parties promote investment by solving collective-action problems...
Main Authors: | Gehlbach, Scott, Keefer, Philip |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5768 |
Similar Items
Similar Items
-
Turnover in Power as a Restraint on Investing in Influence: Evidence from the Postcommunist Transition
by: Milanovic, Branko, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Securing Property Rights in Transition: Lessons from Implementation of China's Rural Land Contracting Law
by: Deininger, Klaus, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Substitution between Foreign Capital in China, India, the Rest of the World, and Latin America: Much Ado about Nothing?
by: Cravino, Javier, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment : China versus the Rest of the World
by: Fan, Joseph P. H., et al.
Published: (2012) -
Attitudes to Income Equality: The 'Socialist Legacy' Revisited
by: Murthi, Mamta, et al.
Published: (2012)