Evidence of the Role of Marketing Arrangements and Valuation Methods in Improving Beef Quality
Low and inconsistent beef quality has been blamed by some for the losses of beef's share of total meat consumption. Tighter vertical coordination through use of alternative marketing arrangements and more precise price signaling through use of different cattle valuation methods may help improve...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4713 |
id |
okr-10986-4713 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-47132021-04-23T14:02:19Z Evidence of the Role of Marketing Arrangements and Valuation Methods in Improving Beef Quality Liu, Yanyan Muth, Mary K. Koontz, Stephen R. Lawrence, John D. Food Beverages Cosmetics Tobacco Wine and Spirits L660 Marketing M310 Agricultural Markets and Marketing Cooperatives Agribusiness Q130 Low and inconsistent beef quality has been blamed by some for the losses of beef's share of total meat consumption. Tighter vertical coordination through use of alternative marketing arrangements and more precise price signaling through use of different cattle valuation methods may help improve beef quality because these mechanisms facilitate information exchange enabling producers to respond better to consumer demand. For the congressionally mandated Livestock and Meat Marketing Study, we modeled differences in levels and variances of cattle quality associated with particular marketing arrangements and valuation methods using fed cattle purchase data from 29 large U.S. beef packing plants for October 2002 through March 2005. Results indicate fed cattle procured through marketing agreements and packer ownership had higher and more consistent quality compared to other types of arrangements. Auction market cattle quality was the most inconsistent. Fed cattle valued using carcass weight with a grid were associated with higher and more consistent quality. 2012-03-30T07:29:22Z 2012-03-30T07:29:22Z 2009-04 Journal Article Agribusiness 07424477 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4713 EN http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Journal Article United States |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
EN |
topic |
Food Beverages Cosmetics Tobacco Wine and Spirits L660 Marketing M310 Agricultural Markets and Marketing Cooperatives Agribusiness Q130 |
spellingShingle |
Food Beverages Cosmetics Tobacco Wine and Spirits L660 Marketing M310 Agricultural Markets and Marketing Cooperatives Agribusiness Q130 Liu, Yanyan Muth, Mary K. Koontz, Stephen R. Lawrence, John D. Evidence of the Role of Marketing Arrangements and Valuation Methods in Improving Beef Quality |
geographic_facet |
United States |
relation |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo |
description |
Low and inconsistent beef quality has been blamed by some for the losses of beef's share of total meat consumption. Tighter vertical coordination through use of alternative marketing arrangements and more precise price signaling through use of different cattle valuation methods may help improve beef quality because these mechanisms facilitate information exchange enabling producers to respond better to consumer demand. For the congressionally mandated Livestock and Meat Marketing Study, we modeled differences in levels and variances of cattle quality associated with particular marketing arrangements and valuation methods using fed cattle purchase data from 29 large U.S. beef packing plants for October 2002 through March 2005. Results indicate fed cattle procured through marketing agreements and packer ownership had higher and more consistent quality compared to other types of arrangements. Auction market cattle quality was the most inconsistent. Fed cattle valued using carcass weight with a grid were associated with higher and more consistent quality. |
format |
Journal Article |
author |
Liu, Yanyan Muth, Mary K. Koontz, Stephen R. Lawrence, John D. |
author_facet |
Liu, Yanyan Muth, Mary K. Koontz, Stephen R. Lawrence, John D. |
author_sort |
Liu, Yanyan |
title |
Evidence of the Role of Marketing Arrangements and Valuation Methods in Improving Beef Quality |
title_short |
Evidence of the Role of Marketing Arrangements and Valuation Methods in Improving Beef Quality |
title_full |
Evidence of the Role of Marketing Arrangements and Valuation Methods in Improving Beef Quality |
title_fullStr |
Evidence of the Role of Marketing Arrangements and Valuation Methods in Improving Beef Quality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evidence of the Role of Marketing Arrangements and Valuation Methods in Improving Beef Quality |
title_sort |
evidence of the role of marketing arrangements and valuation methods in improving beef quality |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4713 |
_version_ |
1764392484762288128 |