Republic of Guatemala Country Environmental Analysis : Addressing the Environmental Aspects of Trade and Infrastructure Expansion
Since the signing of the Peace Accords in 1996, Guatemala has made substantial progress in consolidating peace and democracy. While progress in socioeconomic development has been uneven, there have been important gains in education and health cover...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Report | 
| Language: | English | 
| Published: | 
        
      World Bank, Washington, DC    
    
      2020
     | 
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/356941468033564451/Guatemala-Country-environmental-analysis-addressing-the-environmental-aspects-of-trade-and-infrastructure-expansion http://hdl.handle.net/10986/33927  | 
| Summary: | Since the signing of the Peace Accords
            in 1996, Guatemala has made substantial progress in
            consolidating peace and democracy. While progress in
            socioeconomic development has been uneven, there have been
            important gains in education and health coverage, sustained
            increases in social sector spending, improved coverage of
            basic utility services, and better management of public
            finances, among other gains. Unfortunately, progress has
            been slower than expected in several important areas,
            including economic growth rates. Based on the best regional
            and international practices,  this report concludes that
            mainstreaming environmental considerations into sectoral
            policies rather than scaling-up the operations of
            environmental agencies is the best way to prepare Guatemalan
            institutions for current environmental challenges and those
            it will encounter in the future. The report also emphasizes
            the need to provide the right incentives to economic agents
            (e.g., promoting compliance through achievable requirements
            but with credible sanctions to violators, rather than trying
            to change behavior by threatening with criminal charges that
            are ultimately not enforced), and to engage civil society by
            improving information and participation mechanisms. | 
|---|