Is Class I Top Tier? Can the Civil Service be a Key to Progress in Bangladesh?
The purpose of this study is to help the government of Bangladesh establish a more effective and efficient civil service to move the country toward its goals for social and economic development. The report begins by examining the scope of previous...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Policy Note | 
| Language: | English en_US  | 
| Published: | 
        
      Washington, DC    
    
      2014
     | 
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2006/12/16603116/class-top-tier-can-civil-service-key-progress-bangladesh http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19626  | 
| Summary: | The purpose of this study is to help the
            government of Bangladesh establish a more effective and
            efficient civil service to move the country toward its goals
            for social and economic development. The report begins by
            examining the scope of previous civil service reform
            initiatives in Bangladesh and the reasons why their track
            record has been so poor. This investigation focuses on civil
            service management practices, such as recruitment, training,
            performance evaluation, promotion, and career management.
            The rules and practices guiding these elements of personnel
            management most directly affect civil servants  behavior and
            their approach to their tasks. Although Bangladesh s civil
            service comprises nearly a million officials, this study is
            deliberately restricted to a small group - the Class I
            officers, who make up only 10 percent of the civil service.
            This group is at the tip of the civil service pyramid; it
            has the potential to function as the spearhead of reform.
            The study makes two major recommendations: Give additional
            emphasis to merit in managing the civil service; and focus
            on the fundamentals of civil service reform, where tinkering
            at the edges has been unproductive, by building a stronger
            legal framework, more independent oversight, and better
            tools for managing performance. | 
|---|