Why Follow the Leader? Collective Action, Credible Commitment and Conflict

Most analyses of conflict assume that conflicting groups act in a unitary fashion. This assumption is often violated: to reduce their risk of replacement, group leaders prevent both group members and soldiers from acting collectively, making it dif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Keefer, Philip
Format: Policy Research Working Paper
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/08/16625165/follow-leader-collective-action-credible-commitment-conflict
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12023
id okr-10986-12023
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-120232021-04-23T14:02:59Z Why Follow the Leader? Collective Action, Credible Commitment and Conflict Keefer, Philip AIR FORCE ARMED CONFLICT ARMED FORCES ARMIES ARMORED VEHICLES ARMS ATTACK ATTACKS BARGAINING BATTLE CHILD SOLDIERS CITIZENS CIVIL WAR CIVIL WARS COLLECTIVE ACTION COMBATANTS CONFLICT CONFLICT MANAGEMENT CONFLICT RESEARCH CONFLICT RESOLUTION CONFLICTS CONSTRAINT COUNTERINSURGENCY CRIMINALS DEFENSE DEMOCRACY DOCUMENTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS ELECTIONS ETHNIC CONFLICT ETHNIC DIVERSITY EXPROPRIATION FIGHTING FOUNDATIONS GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM GENOCIDE GUERRILLA GUNS IMPERFECT INFORMATION INCOME INSURANCE INSURGENT INSURGENTS INTERNATIONAL BANK INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION MILITARIES MILITARY EXPENDITURES MILITARY FORCES MILITARY READINESS MILITARY RELATIONS MOTIVATION NATIONAL SECURITY OBSERVERS OPPORTUNISTIC BEHAVIOR OPPORTUNITY COSTS PEACE POLARIZATION POLICE POLITICAL ECONOMICS POLITICAL ECONOMY POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS POLITICAL VIOLENCE PRODUCTIVITY PROFESSIONAL SOLDIERS PROPERTY RIGHTS REBEL REBEL ARMY REBELS RECONSTRUCTION RENTS RULE OF LAW SAFETY SAFETY NET SECURITY FORCES SECURITY THREATS SOCIAL CONFLICT SOLDIERS TACTICS THREAT THREATS TRAP TRIGGER UNEMPLOYMENT VETERANS VIETNAM WAR VIOLENCE VOTING RIGHTS WAGES WARS WEAPONS Most analyses of conflict assume that conflicting groups act in a unitary fashion. This assumption is often violated: to reduce their risk of replacement, group leaders prevent both group members and soldiers from acting collectively, making it difficult for leaders to make credible commitments to them. Lifting the assumption that groups are unitary shifts the analysis of a wide range of conflict issues. The effects of income shocks and rents on conflict risk become contingent on collective action. Leader decisions regarding collective action explain the forcible recruitment of child soldiers and predation on civilians: leaders who prefer to limit military organization are more likely to pursue these tactics. Leader decisions regarding collective action also introduce an unexplored mechanism by which state capacity is created and a specific reason to regard state capacity as endogenous to conflict risk. This focus, finally, suggests that interventions to reduce conflict risk, such as safety net payments or service delivery, are likely to be most difficult to deliver precisely where leaders are most reluctant to allow collective action and where, therefore, conflict risk is highest. 2013-01-02T15:32:05Z 2013-01-02T15:32:05Z 2012-08 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/08/16625165/follow-leader-collective-action-credible-commitment-conflict http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12023 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;no. 6179 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic AIR FORCE
ARMED CONFLICT
ARMED FORCES
ARMIES
ARMORED VEHICLES
ARMS
ATTACK
ATTACKS
BARGAINING
BATTLE
CHILD SOLDIERS
CITIZENS
CIVIL WAR
CIVIL WARS
COLLECTIVE ACTION
COMBATANTS
CONFLICT
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
CONFLICT RESEARCH
CONFLICT RESOLUTION
CONFLICTS
CONSTRAINT
COUNTERINSURGENCY
CRIMINALS
DEFENSE
DEMOCRACY
DOCUMENTS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
ETHNIC CONFLICT
ETHNIC DIVERSITY
EXPROPRIATION
FIGHTING
FOUNDATIONS
GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM
GENOCIDE
GUERRILLA
GUNS
IMPERFECT INFORMATION
INCOME
INSURANCE
INSURGENT
INSURGENTS
INTERNATIONAL BANK
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
MILITARIES
MILITARY EXPENDITURES
MILITARY FORCES
MILITARY READINESS
MILITARY RELATIONS
MOTIVATION
NATIONAL SECURITY
OBSERVERS
OPPORTUNISTIC BEHAVIOR
OPPORTUNITY COSTS
PEACE
POLARIZATION
POLICE
POLITICAL ECONOMICS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS
POLITICAL VIOLENCE
PRODUCTIVITY
PROFESSIONAL SOLDIERS
PROPERTY RIGHTS
REBEL
REBEL ARMY
REBELS
RECONSTRUCTION
RENTS
RULE OF LAW
SAFETY
SAFETY NET
SECURITY FORCES
SECURITY THREATS
SOCIAL CONFLICT
SOLDIERS
TACTICS
THREAT
THREATS
TRAP
TRIGGER
UNEMPLOYMENT
VETERANS
VIETNAM WAR
VIOLENCE
VOTING RIGHTS
WAGES
WARS
WEAPONS
spellingShingle AIR FORCE
ARMED CONFLICT
ARMED FORCES
ARMIES
ARMORED VEHICLES
ARMS
ATTACK
ATTACKS
BARGAINING
BATTLE
CHILD SOLDIERS
CITIZENS
CIVIL WAR
CIVIL WARS
COLLECTIVE ACTION
COMBATANTS
CONFLICT
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
CONFLICT RESEARCH
CONFLICT RESOLUTION
CONFLICTS
CONSTRAINT
COUNTERINSURGENCY
CRIMINALS
DEFENSE
DEMOCRACY
DOCUMENTS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMICS
ELECTIONS
ETHNIC CONFLICT
ETHNIC DIVERSITY
EXPROPRIATION
FIGHTING
FOUNDATIONS
GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM
GENOCIDE
GUERRILLA
GUNS
IMPERFECT INFORMATION
INCOME
INSURANCE
INSURGENT
INSURGENTS
INTERNATIONAL BANK
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
MILITARIES
MILITARY EXPENDITURES
MILITARY FORCES
MILITARY READINESS
MILITARY RELATIONS
MOTIVATION
NATIONAL SECURITY
OBSERVERS
OPPORTUNISTIC BEHAVIOR
OPPORTUNITY COSTS
PEACE
POLARIZATION
POLICE
POLITICAL ECONOMICS
POLITICAL ECONOMY
POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS
POLITICAL VIOLENCE
PRODUCTIVITY
PROFESSIONAL SOLDIERS
PROPERTY RIGHTS
REBEL
REBEL ARMY
REBELS
RECONSTRUCTION
RENTS
RULE OF LAW
SAFETY
SAFETY NET
SECURITY FORCES
SECURITY THREATS
SOCIAL CONFLICT
SOLDIERS
TACTICS
THREAT
THREATS
TRAP
TRIGGER
UNEMPLOYMENT
VETERANS
VIETNAM WAR
VIOLENCE
VOTING RIGHTS
WAGES
WARS
WEAPONS
Keefer, Philip
Why Follow the Leader? Collective Action, Credible Commitment and Conflict
relation Policy Research Working Paper;no. 6179
description Most analyses of conflict assume that conflicting groups act in a unitary fashion. This assumption is often violated: to reduce their risk of replacement, group leaders prevent both group members and soldiers from acting collectively, making it difficult for leaders to make credible commitments to them. Lifting the assumption that groups are unitary shifts the analysis of a wide range of conflict issues. The effects of income shocks and rents on conflict risk become contingent on collective action. Leader decisions regarding collective action explain the forcible recruitment of child soldiers and predation on civilians: leaders who prefer to limit military organization are more likely to pursue these tactics. Leader decisions regarding collective action also introduce an unexplored mechanism by which state capacity is created and a specific reason to regard state capacity as endogenous to conflict risk. This focus, finally, suggests that interventions to reduce conflict risk, such as safety net payments or service delivery, are likely to be most difficult to deliver precisely where leaders are most reluctant to allow collective action and where, therefore, conflict risk is highest.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
author Keefer, Philip
author_facet Keefer, Philip
author_sort Keefer, Philip
title Why Follow the Leader? Collective Action, Credible Commitment and Conflict
title_short Why Follow the Leader? Collective Action, Credible Commitment and Conflict
title_full Why Follow the Leader? Collective Action, Credible Commitment and Conflict
title_fullStr Why Follow the Leader? Collective Action, Credible Commitment and Conflict
title_full_unstemmed Why Follow the Leader? Collective Action, Credible Commitment and Conflict
title_sort why follow the leader? collective action, credible commitment and conflict
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2013
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/08/16625165/follow-leader-collective-action-credible-commitment-conflict
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/12023
_version_ 1764418749556850688