Political instability in the Muslim world: an analysis of regime type and party system

Using the data sets of Fragile States Index (FIS) and the Peace and Conflict Instability Ledger (PCIL) over the past decade, this study has analyzed five types of regimes in the developing countries namely absolute monarchical regimes, authoritarian regimes, constitutional monarchical regimes, presi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Md. , Moniruzzaman, Omar, Muhamad Fuzi
Format: Monograph
Language:English
English
Published: s.n 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/44050/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/44050/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/44050/1/Main_Article_Regume_Types_or_Party_System.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/44050/4/Journal_Acceptance_and_Payment_letter.pdf
id iium-44050
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-440502017-10-16T01:54:40Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/44050/ Political instability in the Muslim world: an analysis of regime type and party system Md. , Moniruzzaman Omar, Muhamad Fuzi JA Political science (General) Using the data sets of Fragile States Index (FIS) and the Peace and Conflict Instability Ledger (PCIL) over the past decade, this study has analyzed five types of regimes in the developing countries namely absolute monarchical regimes, authoritarian regimes, constitutional monarchical regimes, presidential regimes and parliamentary regimes. By looking at the relationship between these regime types and the party system at work in each of these countries this research has indicated that party system matters significantly in political stability and instability. In the case of absolute monarchies where no parties are allowed, they are politically much less unstable. All the authoritarian regimes practice one-party system, and they maintain comparatively high political stability. All the presidential regimes in this study maintain dominant party system amid many other parties at work, and majority of the regimes maintains a low degree of political instability. On the other hand, constitutional monarchies and parliamentary republican regimes operate under multi-party system, and both types of regimes experience relatively higher rate of political instability. Therefore, based on the evidence it is reasonable to conclude that it is not regime type but party system that matters more in political stability or instability. Key words: Political Instability, Muslim World, Party System, Regime Type s.n 2015-12 Monograph NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/44050/1/Main_Article_Regume_Types_or_Party_System.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/44050/4/Journal_Acceptance_and_Payment_letter.pdf Md. , Moniruzzaman and Omar, Muhamad Fuzi (2015) Political instability in the Muslim world: an analysis of regime type and party system. Project Report. s.n. (Unpublished) http://www.macrothink.org/iss
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
English
topic JA Political science (General)
spellingShingle JA Political science (General)
Md. , Moniruzzaman
Omar, Muhamad Fuzi
Political instability in the Muslim world: an analysis of regime type and party system
description Using the data sets of Fragile States Index (FIS) and the Peace and Conflict Instability Ledger (PCIL) over the past decade, this study has analyzed five types of regimes in the developing countries namely absolute monarchical regimes, authoritarian regimes, constitutional monarchical regimes, presidential regimes and parliamentary regimes. By looking at the relationship between these regime types and the party system at work in each of these countries this research has indicated that party system matters significantly in political stability and instability. In the case of absolute monarchies where no parties are allowed, they are politically much less unstable. All the authoritarian regimes practice one-party system, and they maintain comparatively high political stability. All the presidential regimes in this study maintain dominant party system amid many other parties at work, and majority of the regimes maintains a low degree of political instability. On the other hand, constitutional monarchies and parliamentary republican regimes operate under multi-party system, and both types of regimes experience relatively higher rate of political instability. Therefore, based on the evidence it is reasonable to conclude that it is not regime type but party system that matters more in political stability or instability. Key words: Political Instability, Muslim World, Party System, Regime Type
format Monograph
author Md. , Moniruzzaman
Omar, Muhamad Fuzi
author_facet Md. , Moniruzzaman
Omar, Muhamad Fuzi
author_sort Md. , Moniruzzaman
title Political instability in the Muslim world: an analysis of regime type and party system
title_short Political instability in the Muslim world: an analysis of regime type and party system
title_full Political instability in the Muslim world: an analysis of regime type and party system
title_fullStr Political instability in the Muslim world: an analysis of regime type and party system
title_full_unstemmed Political instability in the Muslim world: an analysis of regime type and party system
title_sort political instability in the muslim world: an analysis of regime type and party system
publisher s.n
publishDate 2015
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/44050/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/44050/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/44050/1/Main_Article_Regume_Types_or_Party_System.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/44050/4/Journal_Acceptance_and_Payment_letter.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T21:02:40Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T21:02:40Z
_version_ 1777410727086129152