Are perceptions of organizational justice universal? an exploration of measurement invariance across thirteen cultures

Previous research examined whether justice effects are comparable, focusing on quantitative differences in justice effects. This study examines whether justice perceptions are structured similarly or whether they are qualitatively different across working populations from 13 nations. Confirmatory fa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fischer, Ronald, Ferreira, Maria Cristina, Yu Jiang, Ding, Cheng, Bor-Shiuan, Achoui, Mustapha M., Wong, Corbin C., Baris, Gulfidan, Mendoza, Socorro, Meurs, Nathalie van, Hassan, Arif, Achmadi , Donna, Zeytinoglu, Gunes, Dalyan, Figen, Harb, Charles, Darwish, Dania D., Assmar, Eveline M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/15642/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/15642/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/15642/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/15642/1/SJR_paper.pdf
id iium-15642
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-156422012-01-26T02:43:30Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/15642/ Are perceptions of organizational justice universal? an exploration of measurement invariance across thirteen cultures Fischer, Ronald Ferreira, Maria Cristina Yu Jiang, Ding Cheng, Bor-Shiuan Achoui, Mustapha M. Wong, Corbin C. Baris, Gulfidan Mendoza, Socorro Meurs, Nathalie van Hassan, Arif Achmadi , Donna Hassan, Arif Zeytinoglu, Gunes Dalyan, Figen Harb, Charles Darwish, Dania D. Assmar, Eveline M. HF5549 Personnel management Previous research examined whether justice effects are comparable, focusing on quantitative differences in justice effects. This study examines whether justice perceptions are structured similarly or whether they are qualitatively different across working populations from 13 nations. Confirmatory factor analysis and multi-group analysis show that Colquitt’s (J Appl Psychol 86:386–400, 2001) four dimensional model of justice works well across these samples. However, factor intercorrelations and reliabilities are found to systematically vary between cultural samples. Perceptions of justice are more highly intercorrelated in power distant and collectivistic samples, in line with extensions of the relational model of authority. Score reliabilities were lower in collectivistic settings. Springer Science 2011-12 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/15642/1/SJR_paper.pdf Fischer, Ronald and Ferreira, Maria Cristina and Yu Jiang, Ding and Cheng, Bor-Shiuan and Achoui, Mustapha M. and Wong, Corbin C. and Baris, Gulfidan and Mendoza, Socorro and Meurs, Nathalie van and Hassan, Arif and Achmadi , Donna and Hassan, Arif and Zeytinoglu, Gunes and Dalyan, Figen and Harb, Charles and Darwish, Dania D. and Assmar, Eveline M. (2011) Are perceptions of organizational justice universal? an exploration of measurement invariance across thirteen cultures. Social Justice Research, 24 (4). pp. 297-313. ISSN 1573-6725 http://www.springerlink.com/content/n59x57119t01004x/fulltext.pdf 10.1007/s11211-011-0142-7
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic HF5549 Personnel management
spellingShingle HF5549 Personnel management
Fischer, Ronald
Ferreira, Maria Cristina
Yu Jiang, Ding
Cheng, Bor-Shiuan
Achoui, Mustapha M.
Wong, Corbin C.
Baris, Gulfidan
Mendoza, Socorro
Meurs, Nathalie van
Hassan, Arif
Achmadi , Donna
Hassan, Arif
Zeytinoglu, Gunes
Dalyan, Figen
Harb, Charles
Darwish, Dania D.
Assmar, Eveline M.
Are perceptions of organizational justice universal? an exploration of measurement invariance across thirteen cultures
description Previous research examined whether justice effects are comparable, focusing on quantitative differences in justice effects. This study examines whether justice perceptions are structured similarly or whether they are qualitatively different across working populations from 13 nations. Confirmatory factor analysis and multi-group analysis show that Colquitt’s (J Appl Psychol 86:386–400, 2001) four dimensional model of justice works well across these samples. However, factor intercorrelations and reliabilities are found to systematically vary between cultural samples. Perceptions of justice are more highly intercorrelated in power distant and collectivistic samples, in line with extensions of the relational model of authority. Score reliabilities were lower in collectivistic settings.
format Article
author Fischer, Ronald
Ferreira, Maria Cristina
Yu Jiang, Ding
Cheng, Bor-Shiuan
Achoui, Mustapha M.
Wong, Corbin C.
Baris, Gulfidan
Mendoza, Socorro
Meurs, Nathalie van
Hassan, Arif
Achmadi , Donna
Hassan, Arif
Zeytinoglu, Gunes
Dalyan, Figen
Harb, Charles
Darwish, Dania D.
Assmar, Eveline M.
author_facet Fischer, Ronald
Ferreira, Maria Cristina
Yu Jiang, Ding
Cheng, Bor-Shiuan
Achoui, Mustapha M.
Wong, Corbin C.
Baris, Gulfidan
Mendoza, Socorro
Meurs, Nathalie van
Hassan, Arif
Achmadi , Donna
Hassan, Arif
Zeytinoglu, Gunes
Dalyan, Figen
Harb, Charles
Darwish, Dania D.
Assmar, Eveline M.
author_sort Fischer, Ronald
title Are perceptions of organizational justice universal? an exploration of measurement invariance across thirteen cultures
title_short Are perceptions of organizational justice universal? an exploration of measurement invariance across thirteen cultures
title_full Are perceptions of organizational justice universal? an exploration of measurement invariance across thirteen cultures
title_fullStr Are perceptions of organizational justice universal? an exploration of measurement invariance across thirteen cultures
title_full_unstemmed Are perceptions of organizational justice universal? an exploration of measurement invariance across thirteen cultures
title_sort are perceptions of organizational justice universal? an exploration of measurement invariance across thirteen cultures
publisher Springer Science
publishDate 2011
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/15642/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/15642/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/15642/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/15642/1/SJR_paper.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T20:24:33Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T20:24:33Z
_version_ 1777408329153249280