The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy

This paper discusses findings from a qualitative investigation to identify factors in relation to language-related episodes (LREs) that influence the uptake and retention in the accurate use of subject-verb agreement and prepositions resulting from indirect focused and indirect unfocused written c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Asiah, Kassim, Ng, Lee Luan
Format:	Article
Language:	English English
Published:	MELTA 2014
Subjects:	PE English
Online Access:	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/1/pbmsk-asiah-The_Roles_of_Collaborative.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/4/The%20Roles%20of%20Collaborative%20Dialogue%20in%20Enhancing%20Written%20Corrective%20Feedback%20Efficacy.pdf

id	ump-5878
recordtype	eprints
spelling	ump-58782018-02-19T04:20:37Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/ The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy Asiah, Kassim Ng, Lee Luan PE English This paper discusses findings from a qualitative investigation to identify factors in relation to language-related episodes (LREs) that influence the uptake and retention in the accurate use of subject-verb agreement and prepositions resulting from indirect focused and indirect unfocused written corrective feedback. In relation to these identified factors, the roles of collaborative dialogue were determined through the analyses of the LREs and the interviews with selected participants. The participants in the study who received either focused or unfocused indirect corrective feedback for their written work were required to revise their work collaboratively during the pair talk. Findings from the analyses of the two data sources suggest that collaborative dialogue played a crucial role in enhancing the corrective feedback efficacy in facilitating participants’ language learning development. Primarily, collaborative dialogue enhanced learners’ focus towards ungrammatical uses in written work. Working collaboratively also provided learners with means to extensively deliberate over the corrections, which led to insightful reflections on their existing linguistic knowledge in response to the corrective feedback that they received for their written work. MELTA 2014-04 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/1/pbmsk-asiah-The_Roles_of_Collaborative.pdf application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/4/The%20Roles%20of%20Collaborative%20Dialogue%20in%20Enhancing%20Written%20Corrective%20Feedback%20Efficacy.pdf Asiah, Kassim and Ng, Lee Luan (2014) The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy. Malaysia Journal of ELT Research, 10 (1). pp. 16-30. ISSN 1511-8002 http://www.melta.org.my/majer/vol10/kassim.pdf
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building	UMP Institutional Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English English
topic	PE English
spellingShingle	PE English Asiah, Kassim Ng, Lee Luan The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy
description	This paper discusses findings from a qualitative investigation to identify factors in relation to language-related episodes (LREs) that influence the uptake and retention in the accurate use of subject-verb agreement and prepositions resulting from indirect focused and indirect unfocused written corrective feedback. In relation to these identified factors, the roles of collaborative dialogue were determined through the analyses of the LREs and the interviews with selected participants. The participants in the study who received either focused or unfocused indirect corrective feedback for their written work were required to revise their work collaboratively during the pair talk. Findings from the analyses of the two data sources suggest that collaborative dialogue played a crucial role in enhancing the corrective feedback efficacy in facilitating participants’ language learning development. Primarily, collaborative dialogue enhanced learners’ focus towards ungrammatical uses in written work. Working collaboratively also provided learners with means to extensively deliberate over the corrections, which led to insightful reflections on their existing linguistic knowledge in response to the corrective feedback that they received for their written work.
format	Article
author	Asiah, Kassim Ng, Lee Luan
author_facet	Asiah, Kassim Ng, Lee Luan
author_sort	Asiah, Kassim
title	The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy
title_short	The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy
title_full	The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy
title_fullStr	The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy
title_full_unstemmed	The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy
title_sort	roles of collaborative dialogue in enhancing written corrective feedback efficacy
publisher	MELTA
publishDate	2014
url	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/1/pbmsk-asiah-The_Roles_of_Collaborative.pdf http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5878/4/The%20Roles%20of%20Collaborative%20Dialogue%20in%20Enhancing%20Written%20Corrective%20Feedback%20Efficacy.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T22:01:18Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T22:01:18Z
_version_	1777414416810115072

The Roles of Collaborative Dialogue in Enhancing Written Corrective Feedback Efficacy

Similar Items