Effect of Reinforcement Alignment to the Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite

Numerous applications have been proposed and demonstrated for producing align-fiber composite. However, none had stated a right procedure to align the fiber to optimize the properties of polymer matrix composite (PMC) such as its strength and water absorption property. Therefore, the aim of this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siti Rabiatull Aisha, Idris, Muhammad Hadzreel, M. R. Aeyzarq
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty Mechanical Engineering, UMP 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5206/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5206/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/5206/1/JMES_2013_fkm_UMP.pdf
Description
Summary:Numerous applications have been proposed and demonstrated for producing align-fiber composite. However, none had stated a right procedure to align the fiber to optimize the properties of polymer matrix composite (PMC) such as its strength and water absorption property. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the best alignment of reinforcement material in order to optimize the properties of PMC in its application. In this study, woven roving fiberglass was used as the fiber and unsaturated polyester resin as its matrix material. Hand lay-up process was used to fabricate the laminated composite. The specimens were divided into four major categories with different alignment and thickness of fiber and matrix which were 5 layers bidirectional, 5 layers multidirectional, 7 layers bidirectional, and 7 layers multidirectional. Tensile test showed that bidirectional alignment was better in term of mechanical properties compared to multidirectional alignment. The 5 layers bidirectional have a higher tensile strength compared to 5 layers multidirectional. While 7 layers bidirectional have a higher tensile strength compared to 7 layers multidirectional. The modulus of elasticity of bidirectional alignment was higher than multidirectional alignment. Bidirectional alignment was better because the external tensile load was equally distributed on all the fibers and transmitted along the axis of the fibers. Whereas in case of multidirectional alignment, fiber axes was non-parallel to load axis, resulting in off axis pulling of fibers and increased stress concentration causing the earlier failure of laminates. Water absorption test showed that multidirectional alignment absorbs more quantity of water compared to bidirectional alignment. Therefore, multidirectional alignment was not suitable for underwater application such as boat, canoe and yacht. It can be concluded that, the properties of PMC depending on the alignment of reinforcement material.