Catalytic CO methanation over Mesoporous ZSM5 with different metal promoters

The carbon monoxide methanation has possessed huge potential as an effective method to produce synthetic natural gas (SNG). The basic requirements such as high catalytic activity at low temperatures (<500 °C) and high stability throughout all temperatures is needed for an ideal methanation cataly...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teh, Lee Peng, Triwahyono, Sugeng, Aishah, Abdul Jalil, Setiabudi, H. D., Muhammad Arif, Ab Aziz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Chemical Engineering, Diponegoro University 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24299/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24299/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24299/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24299/1/Catalytic%20CO%20methanation%20over%20Mesoporous%20ZSM5%20with%20different%20metal%20promoters.pdf
Description
Summary:The carbon monoxide methanation has possessed huge potential as an effective method to produce synthetic natural gas (SNG). The basic requirements such as high catalytic activity at low temperatures (<500 °C) and high stability throughout all temperatures is needed for an ideal methanation catalysts. The ultimate goal of the study is to examine the influential of different metal promoters towards catalytic properties and catalytic CO methanation performance. A series of metal promoters (Rh, Co, Pd and Zn) mesoporous ZSM5 were synthesized using an incipient-wetness impregnation method and evaluated for catalytic CO methanation. XRD analysis showed that only metal oxides and no metallic phase of Rh, Co, Pd, and Zn were observed. The nitrogen physisorption analysis showed that mZSM5 possessed high surface area and micro-mesoporosity with intra- and interparticle pores. FESEM analysis illustrated that mZSM5 had typical coffin-type morphology and Rh metal dispersed on the surface of the support was confirmed by EDX analysis. Moreover, Rh (CO conversion = 95%, CH4 yield = 82%) and Co (CO conversion = 91%, CH4 yield = 71%) promoters showed significant improvement in CO methanation. On the other hand, Pd (CO conversion = 18%, CH4 yield = 12%) and Zn (CO conversion = 10%, CH4 yield = 9%) promoters had only low benefit to the CO methanation. This study affirmed that the catalytic activity of CO methanation was influenced by the variation in the type of metal loading due to different nature of metallic phases and their synergistic interaction with the supporting material.