Comperative study of reinforced concrete design of column between American Code (ACI 318-05) and British Standard (BS 8110-97)

The application of American Codes (AC! 318-05) popular in the West Country, this is due to the design by using ACI Codes are more technically advanced and more safety. Currently beside Euro code, American Code also is one of design codes that widely use around the world, and it slowly become an imp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sia, Kee Sieng
Format: Undergraduates Project Papers
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2401/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2401/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2401/1/SIA_KEE_SIENG.PDF
id ump-2401
recordtype eprints
spelling ump-24012015-03-03T07:56:23Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2401/ Comperative study of reinforced concrete design of column between American Code (ACI 318-05) and British Standard (BS 8110-97) Sia, Kee Sieng TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) The application of American Codes (AC! 318-05) popular in the West Country, this is due to the design by using ACI Codes are more technically advanced and more safety. Currently beside Euro code, American Code also is one of design codes that widely use around the world, and it slowly become an important tool of communication in Construction field. Therefore in order to communicate well between the countries it is necessary to implement the American Code. However, the usages of ACI codes in structural building design are not as popular as expected in Malaysia. This is because perception and misunderstanding are still exists among the structural designer. Designer always think that there is not much difference while using the British Standard (BS 8110- 97) as compare with ACT Codes (318-05). Therefore, a study was conducted to review design steps and also to explain technically design of column with ACT Codes. For a better understanding on ACI Codes design process, a work example of ACT Codes on column and comparison of area of reinforcement on several types of column has been done. In this research, the scope of the compare are only focus on the area of reinforcement required with varies of dimension and loading. The result has indicated that although the design process of ACT Codes is more technical but it is easy to understand because the design procedure is more details with the less of assumptions as compare to BS 8110. The result of the research was then show that the area of the required reinforcement of column while design using AC! Codes is almost similar with the column design in BS 8110. 2010-11 Undergraduates Project Papers NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2401/1/SIA_KEE_SIENG.PDF Sia, Kee Sieng (2010) Comperative study of reinforced concrete design of column between American Code (ACI 318-05) and British Standard (BS 8110-97). Faculty of Civil Engineering & Earth Resources, Universiti Malaysia Pahang. http://iportal.ump.edu.my/lib/item?id=chamo:51966&theme=UMP2
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building UMP Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Sia, Kee Sieng
Comperative study of reinforced concrete design of column between American Code (ACI 318-05) and British Standard (BS 8110-97)
description The application of American Codes (AC! 318-05) popular in the West Country, this is due to the design by using ACI Codes are more technically advanced and more safety. Currently beside Euro code, American Code also is one of design codes that widely use around the world, and it slowly become an important tool of communication in Construction field. Therefore in order to communicate well between the countries it is necessary to implement the American Code. However, the usages of ACI codes in structural building design are not as popular as expected in Malaysia. This is because perception and misunderstanding are still exists among the structural designer. Designer always think that there is not much difference while using the British Standard (BS 8110- 97) as compare with ACT Codes (318-05). Therefore, a study was conducted to review design steps and also to explain technically design of column with ACT Codes. For a better understanding on ACI Codes design process, a work example of ACT Codes on column and comparison of area of reinforcement on several types of column has been done. In this research, the scope of the compare are only focus on the area of reinforcement required with varies of dimension and loading. The result has indicated that although the design process of ACT Codes is more technical but it is easy to understand because the design procedure is more details with the less of assumptions as compare to BS 8110. The result of the research was then show that the area of the required reinforcement of column while design using AC! Codes is almost similar with the column design in BS 8110.
format Undergraduates Project Papers
author Sia, Kee Sieng
author_facet Sia, Kee Sieng
author_sort Sia, Kee Sieng
title Comperative study of reinforced concrete design of column between American Code (ACI 318-05) and British Standard (BS 8110-97)
title_short Comperative study of reinforced concrete design of column between American Code (ACI 318-05) and British Standard (BS 8110-97)
title_full Comperative study of reinforced concrete design of column between American Code (ACI 318-05) and British Standard (BS 8110-97)
title_fullStr Comperative study of reinforced concrete design of column between American Code (ACI 318-05) and British Standard (BS 8110-97)
title_full_unstemmed Comperative study of reinforced concrete design of column between American Code (ACI 318-05) and British Standard (BS 8110-97)
title_sort comperative study of reinforced concrete design of column between american code (aci 318-05) and british standard (bs 8110-97)
publishDate 2010
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2401/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2401/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/2401/1/SIA_KEE_SIENG.PDF
first_indexed 2023-09-18T21:56:10Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T21:56:10Z
_version_ 1777414092917571584