Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears

This article presents a comparative study concerning performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing (PECH) and pulsed-electrochemical finishing (PECF) in straight bevel gear finishing. Performance of these processes were compared in terms of average percentage difference in the considered parameters o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Pathak, Sunil, Jain, Neelesh Kumar
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	EDP Sciences 2018
Subjects:	T Technology (General)
Online Access:	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/1/Performance%20of%20pulsed-electrochemical%20honing%20and.pdf

id	ump-23566
recordtype	eprints
spelling	ump-235662019-01-02T03:03:58Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/ Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears Pathak, Sunil Jain, Neelesh Kumar T Technology (General) This article presents a comparative study concerning performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing (PECH) and pulsed-electrochemical finishing (PECF) in straight bevel gear finishing. Performance of these processes were compared in terms of average percentage difference in the considered parameters of surface features of bevel gear namely average percentage differences in average surface roughness ‘PDRa’, maximum surface roughness ‘PDRmax’ and depth of surface roughness ‘PDRz’, micro-geometry (i.e. average percentage differences in single pitch error ‘PDfp’, adjacent pitch error ‘PDfu’, cumulative pitch error ‘PDFp’, and percentage difference in runout ‘PDFr’) and finishing productivity (i.e. material removal rate ‘MRR’). Microstructure and microhardness were also considered as measure for performance assessment. Observed results show PECH is proficient in simultaneously improving all the considered responses of bevel gears by more than 50% as compared to PECF. The PECH-finished gear additionally displayed unrivalled microstructure and better microhardness when contrasted with PECF-finished gear. These changes will upgrade the working-life and operating performance of the finished gear. EDP Sciences 2018 Article PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by_4 http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/1/Performance%20of%20pulsed-electrochemical%20honing%20and.pdf Pathak, Sunil and Jain, Neelesh Kumar (2018) Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears. Manufacturing Review, 5 (14). pp. 1-9. ISSN 2265-4224 https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012 https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2018012
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building	UMP Institutional Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	T Technology (General)
spellingShingle	T Technology (General) Pathak, Sunil Jain, Neelesh Kumar Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
description	This article presents a comparative study concerning performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing (PECH) and pulsed-electrochemical finishing (PECF) in straight bevel gear finishing. Performance of these processes were compared in terms of average percentage difference in the considered parameters of surface features of bevel gear namely average percentage differences in average surface roughness ‘PDRa’, maximum surface roughness ‘PDRmax’ and depth of surface roughness ‘PDRz’, micro-geometry (i.e. average percentage differences in single pitch error ‘PDfp’, adjacent pitch error ‘PDfu’, cumulative pitch error ‘PDFp’, and percentage difference in runout ‘PDFr’) and finishing productivity (i.e. material removal rate ‘MRR’). Microstructure and microhardness were also considered as measure for performance assessment. Observed results show PECH is proficient in simultaneously improving all the considered responses of bevel gears by more than 50% as compared to PECF. The PECH-finished gear additionally displayed unrivalled microstructure and better microhardness when contrasted with PECF-finished gear. These changes will upgrade the working-life and operating performance of the finished gear.
format	Article
author	Pathak, Sunil Jain, Neelesh Kumar
author_facet	Pathak, Sunil Jain, Neelesh Kumar
author_sort	Pathak, Sunil
title	Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
title_short	Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
title_full	Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
title_fullStr	Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
title_full_unstemmed	Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
title_sort	performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears
publisher	EDP Sciences
publishDate	2018
url	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23566/1/Performance%20of%20pulsed-electrochemical%20honing%20and.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T22:35:21Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T22:35:21Z
_version_	1777416558170079232

Performance of pulsed-electrochemical honing and pulsed-electrochemical finishing in improving quality of bevel gears

Similar Items