Cost comparison between the construction of conventional method and interlocking block system

IBS cost usually has many factors to affect it and some of it are swing of market demand, transportation cost, storage cost and so on. However, from the previous study, it is proven through questionnaire survey that lBS system is more effective to use compared to conventional method. The objectives...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Nik Farahiyah , Nik Mohamed
Format:	Undergraduates Project Papers
Language:	English
Published:	2014
Subjects:	TH Building construction
Online Access:	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10249/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10249/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10249/1/NIK%20FARAHIYAH%20BINTI%20NIK%20MOHAMED.PDF

id	ump-10249
recordtype	eprints
spelling	ump-102492015-09-15T07:00:58Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10249/ Cost comparison between the construction of conventional method and interlocking block system Nik Farahiyah , Nik Mohamed TH Building construction IBS cost usually has many factors to affect it and some of it are swing of market demand, transportation cost, storage cost and so on. However, from the previous study, it is proven through questionnaire survey that lBS system is more effective to use compared to conventional method. The objectives for this study are to determine the cost for single, 2-storey and 3-storey house by using the conventional method, to determine the cost for single, 2-storey and 3-storey house by using the interlocking block system and to determine the most economic construction between conventional and interlocking block system in term of material, manpower and time. For this study, the calculation is used to determine the cost for single, 2-storey and 3-storey house from IBS system and conventional method. From the calculation, it performs a Bill of Quantity (BQ) for houses. The BQ shows the different cost and it is possible to choose which house is more economical in term of price. The result of this study shows that the cost for 1 storey house of the interlock block system is 23% less than conventional method. For 2 storey and 3 storey house, it is less 16% and 22% compared to conventional method. So from this result indicate that it is more efficient to use to construct house compare to conventional method. This is because it more economical in term of price. It also takes less time to construct the house and need fewer workers. 2014-06 Undergraduates Project Papers NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10249/1/NIK%20FARAHIYAH%20BINTI%20NIK%20MOHAMED.PDF Nik Farahiyah , Nik Mohamed (2014) Cost comparison between the construction of conventional method and interlocking block system. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources, Universiti Malaysia Pahang. http://iportal.ump.edu.my/lib/item?id=chamo:84679&theme=UMP2
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	Universiti Malaysia Pahang
building	UMP Institutional Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	TH Building construction
spellingShingle	TH Building construction Nik Farahiyah , Nik Mohamed Cost comparison between the construction of conventional method and interlocking block system
description	IBS cost usually has many factors to affect it and some of it are swing of market demand, transportation cost, storage cost and so on. However, from the previous study, it is proven through questionnaire survey that lBS system is more effective to use compared to conventional method. The objectives for this study are to determine the cost for single, 2-storey and 3-storey house by using the conventional method, to determine the cost for single, 2-storey and 3-storey house by using the interlocking block system and to determine the most economic construction between conventional and interlocking block system in term of material, manpower and time. For this study, the calculation is used to determine the cost for single, 2-storey and 3-storey house from IBS system and conventional method. From the calculation, it performs a Bill of Quantity (BQ) for houses. The BQ shows the different cost and it is possible to choose which house is more economical in term of price. The result of this study shows that the cost for 1 storey house of the interlock block system is 23% less than conventional method. For 2 storey and 3 storey house, it is less 16% and 22% compared to conventional method. So from this result indicate that it is more efficient to use to construct house compare to conventional method. This is because it more economical in term of price. It also takes less time to construct the house and need fewer workers.
format	Undergraduates Project Papers
author	Nik Farahiyah , Nik Mohamed
author_facet	Nik Farahiyah , Nik Mohamed
author_sort	Nik Farahiyah , Nik Mohamed
title	Cost comparison between the construction of conventional method and interlocking block system
title_short	Cost comparison between the construction of conventional method and interlocking block system
title_full	Cost comparison between the construction of conventional method and interlocking block system
title_fullStr	Cost comparison between the construction of conventional method and interlocking block system
title_full_unstemmed	Cost comparison between the construction of conventional method and interlocking block system
title_sort	cost comparison between the construction of conventional method and interlocking block system
publishDate	2014
url	http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10249/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10249/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/10249/1/NIK%20FARAHIYAH%20BINTI%20NIK%20MOHAMED.PDF
first_indexed	2023-09-18T22:09:40Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T22:09:40Z
_version_	1777414942399397888

Cost comparison between the construction of conventional method and interlocking block system

Similar Items