Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’

The discourse on ethnic identity is a modern phenomenon. It came along with colonialism, in particular the construction of ‘colonial knowledge’ necessary for purposes of colonial ru,e. The creation of a ‘plural society’ in British Malaya provided the ‘epistemological basis and space’ not only for di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shamsul A.B.
Format: Article
Published: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 1999
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4166/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4166/
id ukm-4166
recordtype eprints
spelling ukm-41662012-05-23T07:41:57Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4166/ Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’ Shamsul A.B., The discourse on ethnic identity is a modern phenomenon. It came along with colonialism, in particular the construction of ‘colonial knowledge’ necessary for purposes of colonial ru,e. The creation of a ‘plural society’ in British Malaya provided the ‘epistemological basis and space’ not only for discourse on ethnic identities but also the assification of ethnic categories into lived reality, be it in the ‘authority-defined’ context as well as the ‘everyday defined’ context. This essay traces the historical trajectory of the construction of Malaysia’s two major ethnic groups, namely, Malay and Chinese, as well as what constitutes “Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’. It also offers a brief comparative commentary on the latter. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 1999-07 Article PeerReviewed Shamsul A.B., (1999) Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’. AKADEMIKA, 55 . pp. 17-37. ISSN 0126-5008 http://pkukmweb.ukm.my/penerbit/jdem55-01.html
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The discourse on ethnic identity is a modern phenomenon. It came along with colonialism, in particular the construction of ‘colonial knowledge’ necessary for purposes of colonial ru,e. The creation of a ‘plural society’ in British Malaya provided the ‘epistemological basis and space’ not only for discourse on ethnic identities but also the assification of ethnic categories into lived reality, be it in the ‘authority-defined’ context as well as the ‘everyday defined’ context. This essay traces the historical trajectory of the construction of Malaysia’s two major ethnic groups, namely, Malay and Chinese, as well as what constitutes “Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’. It also offers a brief comparative commentary on the latter.
format Article
author Shamsul A.B.,
spellingShingle Shamsul A.B.,
Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’
author_facet Shamsul A.B.,
author_sort Shamsul A.B.,
title Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’
title_short Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’
title_full Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’
title_fullStr Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’
title_full_unstemmed Identity contestation in Malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘Malayness’ and ‘Chineseness’
title_sort identity contestation in malaysia: a comparative commentary on ‘malayness’ and ‘chineseness’
publisher Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 1999
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4166/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4166/
first_indexed 2023-09-18T19:40:48Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T19:40:48Z
_version_ 1777405576698920960