Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies

`Malaysian studies' as a field of social scientific study has its roots in `colonial knowledge' which in turn has had European social theory and classificatory schema as its epistemological basis. Hence social analysis of Malaysian society; be it based on the `ethnicity' or `class...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shamsul A.B.
Format: Article
Published: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 1998
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4156/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4156/
id ukm-4156
recordtype eprints
spelling ukm-41562012-05-23T04:53:22Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4156/ Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies Shamsul A.B., `Malaysian studies' as a field of social scientific study has its roots in `colonial knowledge' which in turn has had European social theory and classificatory schema as its epistemological basis. Hence social analysis of Malaysian society; be it based on the `ethnicity' or `class' or `culture' or `identity' paradigm, has been framed in the same epistemological framework. This essay discusses critically the origin of each of the said paradigms, especially its development from the sphere of `public advocacy' to the realm of `academic analyses', in a historical and longitudinal perspectie from the colonial era to the contemporary period, and in due process highlights not only the co-existence and competing nature of these paradigms but also the major contributors and their contributons within each paradigm. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 1998-07 Article PeerReviewed Shamsul A.B., (1998) Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies. AKADEMIKA, 53 . pp. 33-59. ISSN 0126-5008 http://pkukmweb.ukm.my/penerbit/jdem53-3.htm
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description `Malaysian studies' as a field of social scientific study has its roots in `colonial knowledge' which in turn has had European social theory and classificatory schema as its epistemological basis. Hence social analysis of Malaysian society; be it based on the `ethnicity' or `class' or `culture' or `identity' paradigm, has been framed in the same epistemological framework. This essay discusses critically the origin of each of the said paradigms, especially its development from the sphere of `public advocacy' to the realm of `academic analyses', in a historical and longitudinal perspectie from the colonial era to the contemporary period, and in due process highlights not only the co-existence and competing nature of these paradigms but also the major contributors and their contributons within each paradigm.
format Article
author Shamsul A.B.,
spellingShingle Shamsul A.B.,
Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies
author_facet Shamsul A.B.,
author_sort Shamsul A.B.,
title Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies
title_short Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies
title_full Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies
title_fullStr Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies
title_full_unstemmed Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies
title_sort ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in malaysian studies
publisher Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 1998
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4156/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4156/
first_indexed 2023-09-18T19:40:46Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T19:40:46Z
_version_ 1777405575261323264