Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies
`Malaysian studies' as a field of social scientific study has its roots in `colonial knowledge' which in turn has had European social theory and classificatory schema as its epistemological basis. Hence social analysis of Malaysian society; be it based on the `ethnicity' or `class...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
1998
|
Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4156/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4156/ |
id |
ukm-4156 |
---|---|
recordtype |
eprints |
spelling |
ukm-41562012-05-23T04:53:22Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4156/ Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies Shamsul A.B., `Malaysian studies' as a field of social scientific study has its roots in `colonial knowledge' which in turn has had European social theory and classificatory schema as its epistemological basis. Hence social analysis of Malaysian society; be it based on the `ethnicity' or `class' or `culture' or `identity' paradigm, has been framed in the same epistemological framework. This essay discusses critically the origin of each of the said paradigms, especially its development from the sphere of `public advocacy' to the realm of `academic analyses', in a historical and longitudinal perspectie from the colonial era to the contemporary period, and in due process highlights not only the co-existence and competing nature of these paradigms but also the major contributors and their contributons within each paradigm. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 1998-07 Article PeerReviewed Shamsul A.B., (1998) Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies. AKADEMIKA, 53 . pp. 33-59. ISSN 0126-5008 http://pkukmweb.ukm.my/penerbit/jdem53-3.htm |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Local University |
institution |
Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia |
building |
UKM Institutional Repository |
collection |
Online Access |
description |
`Malaysian studies' as a field of social scientific study has its roots in `colonial knowledge' which in turn has had European social theory and classificatory schema as its epistemological basis. Hence social analysis of Malaysian society; be it based on the `ethnicity' or `class' or `culture' or `identity' paradigm, has been framed in the same epistemological framework. This essay discusses critically the origin of each of the said paradigms, especially its development from the sphere of `public advocacy' to the realm of `academic analyses', in a historical and longitudinal perspectie from the colonial era to the contemporary period, and in due process highlights not only the co-existence and competing nature of these paradigms but also the major contributors and their contributons within each paradigm. |
format |
Article |
author |
Shamsul A.B., |
spellingShingle |
Shamsul A.B., Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies |
author_facet |
Shamsul A.B., |
author_sort |
Shamsul A.B., |
title |
Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies |
title_short |
Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies |
title_full |
Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies |
title_fullStr |
Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in Malaysian studies |
title_sort |
ethnicity, class, culture or identity? competing paradigms in malaysian studies |
publisher |
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
publishDate |
1998 |
url |
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4156/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4156/ |
first_indexed |
2023-09-18T19:40:46Z |
last_indexed |
2023-09-18T19:40:46Z |
_version_ |
1777405575261323264 |