Sejarah politik Mamluk (648-922H/1250-1517M): suatu pengamatan berdasarkan sumber primer dan sekunder

This article aims to analyze some issues that are less known to the public i.e. the origin and emergence of the Mamluks in Egypt and the incorrect application of terminologies of ‘Mamluk Bahri’ and ‘Mamluk Burji’ as used today. It also discusses the political history of the Mamluks from its establis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Maryam Mohd Daud, Zamri Ariffin
Format:	Article
Language:	English English
Published:	Institut Kajian Rantau Asia Barat 2010
Online Access:	http://journalarticle.ukm.my/263/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/263/1/1.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/263/2/1.pdf

id	ukm-263
recordtype	eprints
spelling	ukm-2632016-12-14T06:26:52Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/263/ Sejarah politik Mamluk (648-922H/1250-1517M): suatu pengamatan berdasarkan sumber primer dan sekunder Maryam Mohd Daud, Zamri Ariffin, This article aims to analyze some issues that are less known to the public i.e. the origin and emergence of the Mamluks in Egypt and the incorrect application of terminologies of ‘Mamluk Bahri’ and ‘Mamluk Burji’ as used today. It also discusses the political history of the Mamluks from its establishment in 648H/1250M until its fall in 922H/1517M based on the primary and secondary sources. The main focus is given to the political abilities of some Mamluk sultans to sustain their powers. The article finds that the emergence of the Mamluk has started since the ‘Abbasid period. Nevertheless, their existence and their roles began to receive serious attention in the last days of Ayyubid period especially once they succeeded in establishing the Mamluk kingdom. Two of the dominant origins in the Mamluk sultanate were ‘Turkish’ and ‘Jarkash (Circassian).’ Based on these two ethnics, the terminologies of the ‘Turkish Mamluk’ and ‘Circassian Mamluk’ should be applied as used by the Mamluk historians in their writings. In the Mamluk sultanate, the empowerment strategy of any of the sultan was a ‘must’ because of the power struggling among the groups in the Mamluks to usurp the throne. The sultan also needed to strengthen the economic and social stability in order to continue his rule. This included overcoming the challenges and threats from outside enemies. From a large number of the Mamluk sultans, only a few succeeded in their reigns. Institut Kajian Rantau Asia Barat 2010 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/263/1/1.pdf application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/263/2/1.pdf Maryam Mohd Daud, and Zamri Ariffin, (2010) Sejarah politik Mamluk (648-922H/1250-1517M): suatu pengamatan berdasarkan sumber primer dan sekunder. Jurnal Antarabangsa Kajian Asia Barat, 2 (2). pp. 17-45. ISSN 2229-8924
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
building	UKM Institutional Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English English
description	This article aims to analyze some issues that are less known to the public i.e. the origin and emergence of the Mamluks in Egypt and the incorrect application of terminologies of ‘Mamluk Bahri’ and ‘Mamluk Burji’ as used today. It also discusses the political history of the Mamluks from its establishment in 648H/1250M until its fall in 922H/1517M based on the primary and secondary sources. The main focus is given to the political abilities of some Mamluk sultans to sustain their powers. The article finds that the emergence of the Mamluk has started since the ‘Abbasid period. Nevertheless, their existence and their roles began to receive serious attention in the last days of Ayyubid period especially once they succeeded in establishing the Mamluk kingdom. Two of the dominant origins in the Mamluk sultanate were ‘Turkish’ and ‘Jarkash (Circassian).’ Based on these two ethnics, the terminologies of the ‘Turkish Mamluk’ and ‘Circassian Mamluk’ should be applied as used by the Mamluk historians in their writings. In the Mamluk sultanate, the empowerment strategy of any of the sultan was a ‘must’ because of the power struggling among the groups in the Mamluks to usurp the throne. The sultan also needed to strengthen the economic and social stability in order to continue his rule. This included overcoming the challenges and threats from outside enemies. From a large number of the Mamluk sultans, only a few succeeded in their reigns.
format	Article
author	Maryam Mohd Daud, Zamri Ariffin,
spellingShingle	Maryam Mohd Daud, Zamri Ariffin, Sejarah politik Mamluk (648-922H/1250-1517M): suatu pengamatan berdasarkan sumber primer dan sekunder
author_facet	Maryam Mohd Daud, Zamri Ariffin,
author_sort	Maryam Mohd Daud,
title	Sejarah politik Mamluk (648-922H/1250-1517M): suatu pengamatan berdasarkan sumber primer dan sekunder
title_short	Sejarah politik Mamluk (648-922H/1250-1517M): suatu pengamatan berdasarkan sumber primer dan sekunder
title_full	Sejarah politik Mamluk (648-922H/1250-1517M): suatu pengamatan berdasarkan sumber primer dan sekunder
title_fullStr	Sejarah politik Mamluk (648-922H/1250-1517M): suatu pengamatan berdasarkan sumber primer dan sekunder
title_full_unstemmed	Sejarah politik Mamluk (648-922H/1250-1517M): suatu pengamatan berdasarkan sumber primer dan sekunder
title_sort	sejarah politik mamluk (648-922h/1250-1517m): suatu pengamatan berdasarkan sumber primer dan sekunder
publisher	Institut Kajian Rantau Asia Barat
publishDate	2010
url	http://journalarticle.ukm.my/263/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/263/1/1.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/263/2/1.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T19:01:35Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T19:01:35Z
_version_	1777403109243355136

Sejarah politik Mamluk (648-922H/1250-1517M): suatu pengamatan berdasarkan sumber primer dan sekunder

Similar Items