Language and political psychology: can grammar influence electability?

Daily, the public is plied with political messages from various sources and millions are invested in campaign ads each election year. Yet, surprisingly little is known about the influence of linguistic details in such messages on attitudes about political candidates, especially within the context...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tan, Debbita Ai Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2019
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14086/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14086/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14086/1/30854-107969-1-PB.pdf
id ukm-14086
recordtype eprints
spelling ukm-140862020-01-31T22:43:11Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14086/ Language and political psychology: can grammar influence electability? Tan, Debbita Ai Lin Daily, the public is plied with political messages from various sources and millions are invested in campaign ads each election year. Yet, surprisingly little is known about the influence of linguistic details in such messages on attitudes about political candidates, especially within the context of Malaysia. The present study is grounded within the structure of framing and grammar, and suggests that grammar can influence attitudes towards a candidate’s electability. The study involved 387 male and female Malaysian university students (19- to 25-year-olds) of various ethnicities. The researcher designed two comprehensive questionnaires based on Fausey and Matlock’s (2011) work. Participants were randomly assigned Version A (n=192) or Version B (n=195) of the questionnaire. Both versions were about the conduct of Members of Parliament, unnamed and without party labels, to avoid bias about actual politicians. The conduct or actions were of negative and positive valence; Version A was framed using the imperfective form [‘was verb + ing’] and employed the modal verb ‘must’, whereas Version B was framed using the perfective form [‘verb + ed’] and employed the modal verb ‘have to’. Primarily, results revealed that imperfective descriptions of negative actions resulted in negative responses to the re-election of a candidate. However, the participants were largely insensitive to grammatical alteration when judging a candidate’s past positive actions. The results on modality demonstrated a preference for the modal verb ‘must’ which carries more “emotional value” than ‘have to’. The present study is novel in that it covers the dimension of modality (which has never been explored in previous studies) and that to date, there is no available research similar to it in the Malaysian context. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2019-08 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14086/1/30854-107969-1-PB.pdf Tan, Debbita Ai Lin (2019) Language and political psychology: can grammar influence electability? GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies, 19 (3). pp. 1-21. ISSN 1675-8021 http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1212
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
language English
description Daily, the public is plied with political messages from various sources and millions are invested in campaign ads each election year. Yet, surprisingly little is known about the influence of linguistic details in such messages on attitudes about political candidates, especially within the context of Malaysia. The present study is grounded within the structure of framing and grammar, and suggests that grammar can influence attitudes towards a candidate’s electability. The study involved 387 male and female Malaysian university students (19- to 25-year-olds) of various ethnicities. The researcher designed two comprehensive questionnaires based on Fausey and Matlock’s (2011) work. Participants were randomly assigned Version A (n=192) or Version B (n=195) of the questionnaire. Both versions were about the conduct of Members of Parliament, unnamed and without party labels, to avoid bias about actual politicians. The conduct or actions were of negative and positive valence; Version A was framed using the imperfective form [‘was verb + ing’] and employed the modal verb ‘must’, whereas Version B was framed using the perfective form [‘verb + ed’] and employed the modal verb ‘have to’. Primarily, results revealed that imperfective descriptions of negative actions resulted in negative responses to the re-election of a candidate. However, the participants were largely insensitive to grammatical alteration when judging a candidate’s past positive actions. The results on modality demonstrated a preference for the modal verb ‘must’ which carries more “emotional value” than ‘have to’. The present study is novel in that it covers the dimension of modality (which has never been explored in previous studies) and that to date, there is no available research similar to it in the Malaysian context.
format Article
author Tan, Debbita Ai Lin
spellingShingle Tan, Debbita Ai Lin
Language and political psychology: can grammar influence electability?
author_facet Tan, Debbita Ai Lin
author_sort Tan, Debbita Ai Lin
title Language and political psychology: can grammar influence electability?
title_short Language and political psychology: can grammar influence electability?
title_full Language and political psychology: can grammar influence electability?
title_fullStr Language and political psychology: can grammar influence electability?
title_full_unstemmed Language and political psychology: can grammar influence electability?
title_sort language and political psychology: can grammar influence electability?
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2019
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14086/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14086/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14086/1/30854-107969-1-PB.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T20:06:18Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T20:06:18Z
_version_ 1777407181540294656