Word meanings in oral and written psychiatrist-patient communication
The evolving trends in today’s institutional psychiatrist-patient communication give rise to non-transparent research methods and communication failures in psychiatry. We see the source of such problematic practices in fundamental misunderstanding and misuse of a word as a linguistic unit in mode...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2019
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14043/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14043/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14043/1/27767-96200-2-PB.pdf |
| Summary: | The evolving trends in today’s institutional psychiatrist-patient communication give rise to
non-transparent research methods and communication failures in psychiatry. We see the
source of such problematic practices in fundamental misunderstanding and misuse of a word
as a linguistic unit in modern psychiatric research. Our study focuses on the use of
polysemantic words in psychiatrist-patient communication. We explore how psychiatrists and
patients interact to infer meanings from words and expressions crucial for the outcome of
psychiatrist-patient communication in various institutional settings. The study is qualitative
and interdisciplinary: it is a semantic analysis supported by evidence from clinical interviews
and enhanced by the observations of a psychiatrist. The results are presented in two parts.
Part 1 focuses on the word meaning in an oral clinical interview. We analyze examples of
mental patients’ utterances from clinical interviews and describe how psychiatrists elicit
meanings from their patients’ utterances in a clinical setting. In Part 2 we describe the
different ways in which words are used and interpreted by patients and clinicians in written
communication mediated by a psychiatric clinical research questionnaire. We conclude this
article by interpreting our results with regard to the objectives and values of the clinical
discourse, and discussing whether or not the new ways of word usage boost the institutional
capacity of mental health care. |
|---|