Mass communication sciences in the Maghreb: a hybrid identity for an evolving discipline
Throughout the world, mass communication sciences had faced many difficulties to impose itself in the academic and administrative spheres as a new, entirely independent discipline. Even nowadays, certain fierce opponents still refuse to admit that it is a discipline, claiming that it is only a fie...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2016
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10518/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10518/ http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10518/1/16495-46338-1-SM.pdf |
| Summary: | Throughout the world, mass communication sciences had faced many difficulties to impose itself in the
academic and administrative spheres as a new, entirely independent discipline. Even nowadays, certain
fierce opponents still refuse to admit that it is a discipline, claiming that it is only a field. Indeed the
discipline is now established and well recognized in the major countries of the world, but it did not
undertake the same path in all parts of the world. This article discusses the issue of Mass
Communication Sciences’ state in Maghreb. It focuses on the historical, political, academic and
administrative considerations which influenced its progress in three countries, namely: Algeria, Tunisia
and Morocco. The purpose is to identify the influences that marked the advent and development of the
discipline in the region. The study found out that Mass Communication Sciences in the Maghreb
suffered from the lack of visibility on its identity; this is essentially due to the name given to the
discipline ‘Information and Communication Sciences’, inherited from the French administration as the
former colonizing or protective state of the three countries. The study also highlights the ambiguity
which accompanied the establishment of a discipline that first emerged from the reduced ‘journalism’
appellation, and finds itself secondly considered as a simple branch of Political Sciences, which poses
the question of its legitimacy in academic decision makers’ minds. Finally, the study underlines the
impact of the absence of professional associations able to defend the interests of the discipline and to
represent it within the different administrative or academic decision levels, either in the three single
countries or at a regional level. |
|---|