A corpus analysis of metadiscourse in good and weak undergraduate academic writing / Amaal Fadhlini Mohamed

The concept of metadiscourse is one of the essential areas in academic writing. However, little is known as to how it is actually used by undergraduates in their writing. In academic writing, metadiscourse refers to the linguistic expressions or terms used in a piece of writing to organize the idea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Mohamed, Amaal Fadhlini
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English
Published:	2014
Subjects:	Malaysia
Online Access:	http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/26437/ http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/26437/1/TM_AMAAL%20FADHLINI%20MOHAMED%20%20APB%2014_5.pdf

id	uitm-26437
recordtype	eprints
spelling	uitm-264372019-11-14T05:03:27Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/26437/ A corpus analysis of metadiscourse in good and weak undergraduate academic writing / Amaal Fadhlini Mohamed Mohamed, Amaal Fadhlini Malaysia The concept of metadiscourse is one of the essential areas in academic writing. However, little is known as to how it is actually used by undergraduates in their writing. In academic writing, metadiscourse refers to the linguistic expressions or terms used in a piece of writing to organize the ideas and contents of a text while leading the readersto understanding. This research identifies categories and forms of metadiscourse used in a corpus of undergraduate academic writing in Asasi Science and Engineering (MUAWRISE corpus). A comparison of metadiscourse used between two sub-corpora of good (GAW corpus) and weak (WAW corpus) academic writing was done. This present study is therefore relevant as it investigates how metadiscourse markers are applied by tertiary level students to write effectively in their academic writing. Since metadiscourse has never been directly taught as a subject to undergraduate students, it may contribute to raising their awareness on metadiscourse functions in effective writing. This is a corpus-based research study that involves qualitative (conceptual analysis) and quantitative (descriptive analysis) approaches to identify metadiscourse items in the coipus. Although this corpus comprises of both good essays (GAW corpus) and weak essays (WAW corpus), however, they show a higher frequency of use in interactive metadiscourse as compared to interactional metadiscourse category. It is found that more metadiscourse items (based on Occurrence per 10, 000 words) were found in weak essays (WAW corpus) as compared to good essays (GAW corpus). Both GAW and WAW corpora also show a higher frequency of use in interactive metadiscourse as compared to interactional metadiscourse category. More forms of metadiscourse were found in good essays (GAW corpus) as compared to weak essays (WAW corpus). Thus, the findings of this study give input to the body of knowledge in metadiscourse. 2014 Thesis NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/26437/1/TM_AMAAL%20FADHLINI%20MOHAMED%20%20APB%2014_5.pdf Mohamed, Amaal Fadhlini (2014) A corpus analysis of metadiscourse in good and weak undergraduate academic writing / Amaal Fadhlini Mohamed. Masters thesis, Universiti Teknologi MARA.
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	Universiti Teknologi MARA
building	UiTM Institutional Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	Malaysia
spellingShingle	Malaysia Mohamed, Amaal Fadhlini A corpus analysis of metadiscourse in good and weak undergraduate academic writing / Amaal Fadhlini Mohamed
description	The concept of metadiscourse is one of the essential areas in academic writing. However, little is known as to how it is actually used by undergraduates in their writing. In academic writing, metadiscourse refers to the linguistic expressions or terms used in a piece of writing to organize the ideas and contents of a text while leading the readersto understanding. This research identifies categories and forms of metadiscourse used in a corpus of undergraduate academic writing in Asasi Science and Engineering (MUAWRISE corpus). A comparison of metadiscourse used between two sub-corpora of good (GAW corpus) and weak (WAW corpus) academic writing was done. This present study is therefore relevant as it investigates how metadiscourse markers are applied by tertiary level students to write effectively in their academic writing. Since metadiscourse has never been directly taught as a subject to undergraduate students, it may contribute to raising their awareness on metadiscourse functions in effective writing. This is a corpus-based research study that involves qualitative (conceptual analysis) and quantitative (descriptive analysis) approaches to identify metadiscourse items in the coipus. Although this corpus comprises of both good essays (GAW corpus) and weak essays (WAW corpus), however, they show a higher frequency of use in interactive metadiscourse as compared to interactional metadiscourse category. It is found that more metadiscourse items (based on Occurrence per 10, 000 words) were found in weak essays (WAW corpus) as compared to good essays (GAW corpus). Both GAW and WAW corpora also show a higher frequency of use in interactive metadiscourse as compared to interactional metadiscourse category. More forms of metadiscourse were found in good essays (GAW corpus) as compared to weak essays (WAW corpus). Thus, the findings of this study give input to the body of knowledge in metadiscourse.
format	Thesis
author	Mohamed, Amaal Fadhlini
author_facet	Mohamed, Amaal Fadhlini
author_sort	Mohamed, Amaal Fadhlini
title	A corpus analysis of metadiscourse in good and weak undergraduate academic writing / Amaal Fadhlini Mohamed
title_short	A corpus analysis of metadiscourse in good and weak undergraduate academic writing / Amaal Fadhlini Mohamed
title_full	A corpus analysis of metadiscourse in good and weak undergraduate academic writing / Amaal Fadhlini Mohamed
title_fullStr	A corpus analysis of metadiscourse in good and weak undergraduate academic writing / Amaal Fadhlini Mohamed
title_full_unstemmed	A corpus analysis of metadiscourse in good and weak undergraduate academic writing / Amaal Fadhlini Mohamed
title_sort	corpus analysis of metadiscourse in good and weak undergraduate academic writing / amaal fadhlini mohamed
publishDate	2014
url	http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/26437/ http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/26437/1/TM_AMAAL%20FADHLINI%20MOHAMED%20%20APB%2014_5.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T23:16:51Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T23:16:51Z
_version_	1777419169776533504

A corpus analysis of metadiscourse in good and weak undergraduate academic writing / Amaal Fadhlini Mohamed

Similar Items