Comparison of speed, agility and power between forwards and backlines among UiTM Pahang rugby player / Muhammad Syafiq Safruddin

The purpose of this study is to compare speed, agility and power between forwards and backlines among rugby players. A total forty subject (N=40) from Uitm Pahang Rugby Players, were selected through purposive sampling. The study was using an ex post facto design to conduct this study. The study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Safruddin, Muhammad Syafiq
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Sport Science and Recreation 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/25994/
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/25994/1/PPb_MUHAMMAD%20SYAFIQ%20SAFRUDDIN%20SR%20C%2019_5.PDF
id uitm-25994
recordtype eprints
spelling uitm-259942019-11-25T07:26:46Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/25994/ Comparison of speed, agility and power between forwards and backlines among UiTM Pahang rugby player / Muhammad Syafiq Safruddin Safruddin, Muhammad Syafiq Testing. Evaluation of performance General works. Athletes Relation to psychology. Sports psychology The purpose of this study is to compare speed, agility and power between forwards and backlines among rugby players. A total forty subject (N=40) from Uitm Pahang Rugby Players, were selected through purposive sampling. The study was using an ex post facto design to conduct this study. The study compared of the result of post-test of30 meters sprint speed test, Illinois agility test and standing long jump test. All subject will perform only two trials for each test. They will perform for speed in the first day. The next day, they will perform a power and agility test. This study used an independent sample T-test for data analysis. There is significant difference of hypotheses testing for the 30 meter sprint speed test which is forward (M=0.520, SD=0.411) and backline (M=0.484, SD=O.215); t(40)=3.503, (p=O.OO). Hypotheses testing for Illinois agility test which is forward (M=18.33, SD=O.828) and backline (M=16.55, SD=O.634); t(40)=7.640, (p=O.OOO). The last hypotheses testing for standing long jump test which is forward (M=1.923, SD=0.486) and backline (M=2.449, SD=0.208); t (40)=-4.448, (p=0.000). To conclude, this finding suggest that backlines have greater fitness component in term of speed, agility and power than forwards. Faculty of Sport Science and Recreation 2019 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/25994/1/PPb_MUHAMMAD%20SYAFIQ%20SAFRUDDIN%20SR%20C%2019_5.PDF Safruddin, Muhammad Syafiq (2019) Comparison of speed, agility and power between forwards and backlines among UiTM Pahang rugby player / Muhammad Syafiq Safruddin. [Student Project] (Unpublished)
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
building UiTM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic Testing. Evaluation of performance
General works. Athletes
Relation to psychology. Sports psychology
spellingShingle Testing. Evaluation of performance
General works. Athletes
Relation to psychology. Sports psychology
Safruddin, Muhammad Syafiq
Comparison of speed, agility and power between forwards and backlines among UiTM Pahang rugby player / Muhammad Syafiq Safruddin
description The purpose of this study is to compare speed, agility and power between forwards and backlines among rugby players. A total forty subject (N=40) from Uitm Pahang Rugby Players, were selected through purposive sampling. The study was using an ex post facto design to conduct this study. The study compared of the result of post-test of30 meters sprint speed test, Illinois agility test and standing long jump test. All subject will perform only two trials for each test. They will perform for speed in the first day. The next day, they will perform a power and agility test. This study used an independent sample T-test for data analysis. There is significant difference of hypotheses testing for the 30 meter sprint speed test which is forward (M=0.520, SD=0.411) and backline (M=0.484, SD=O.215); t(40)=3.503, (p=O.OO). Hypotheses testing for Illinois agility test which is forward (M=18.33, SD=O.828) and backline (M=16.55, SD=O.634); t(40)=7.640, (p=O.OOO). The last hypotheses testing for standing long jump test which is forward (M=1.923, SD=0.486) and backline (M=2.449, SD=0.208); t (40)=-4.448, (p=0.000). To conclude, this finding suggest that backlines have greater fitness component in term of speed, agility and power than forwards.
format Student Project
author Safruddin, Muhammad Syafiq
author_facet Safruddin, Muhammad Syafiq
author_sort Safruddin, Muhammad Syafiq
title Comparison of speed, agility and power between forwards and backlines among UiTM Pahang rugby player / Muhammad Syafiq Safruddin
title_short Comparison of speed, agility and power between forwards and backlines among UiTM Pahang rugby player / Muhammad Syafiq Safruddin
title_full Comparison of speed, agility and power between forwards and backlines among UiTM Pahang rugby player / Muhammad Syafiq Safruddin
title_fullStr Comparison of speed, agility and power between forwards and backlines among UiTM Pahang rugby player / Muhammad Syafiq Safruddin
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of speed, agility and power between forwards and backlines among UiTM Pahang rugby player / Muhammad Syafiq Safruddin
title_sort comparison of speed, agility and power between forwards and backlines among uitm pahang rugby player / muhammad syafiq safruddin
publisher Faculty of Sport Science and Recreation
publishDate 2019
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/25994/
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/25994/1/PPb_MUHAMMAD%20SYAFIQ%20SAFRUDDIN%20SR%20C%2019_5.PDF
first_indexed 2023-09-18T23:15:56Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T23:15:56Z
_version_ 1777419111612022784