The effects of cold water immersion, active recovery and passive recovery on heart rate and blood pressure among male rugby athletes / Raja Nur Anggraeny Raja Ismail
Proper rehabilitation process can lessen the fatigue, enhances the responses of the psychological and physiological regeneration and also increase the level of athletes' fitness. Fail to properly recover after intense physical activities may lead to stresses on psychology and physiology and...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Student Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculty of Sport Science and Recreation
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/22007/ http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/22007/1/PPb_RAJA%20NUR%20ANGGRAENY%20RAJA%20ISMAIL%20SR%20C%2017_5.PDF |
Summary: | Proper rehabilitation process can lessen the fatigue, enhances the responses of the
psychological and physiological regeneration and also increase the level of athletes'
fitness. Fail to properly recover after intense physical activities may lead to stresses
on psychology and physiology and consequently decrease performance and elevates
the injury risk. The main reason for the present study was to investigate the cold
water immersion, active recovery and passive recovery effects on heart rate and
blood pressure levels among male rugby athletes. 18 young athletes volunteered were
divided into three groups of cold water immersion (n=6), active recovery (n=6) and
passive recovery (n=6). Subjects performed the Cooper test. Heart rate and blood
pressure measurement were taken three times, before performed the test,
immediately after performed the test and after performed the 20 minutes of recovery
methods. Data analysis was analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Result
shows that there was no significant difference on heart rate levels among all three
different recovery methods group (p=0.275). However, there are significant
differences on systolic and diastolic blood pressure level among all three different
recovery methods group with p=O.OOO and p=0.008 respectively. Result showed that
there was no significant difference on heart rate among all three groups. However,
there were significant differences on the blood pressure among all three groups. In
addition, the effects of all three recovery methods on blood lactate levels should be
made for further research. |
---|