Mechanical and physical properties of hybrid oil palm-rubberwood engineered veneer lumber (HOPREV) for furniture components / Mohd Hafiz Musa

The main objective of this study was to evaluate some of the mechanical and physical properties of Hybrid Oil Palm-Rubberwood Engineered Veneer Lumber (HOPREV). This study evaluated the affect of different binders (urea formaldehyde as control sample (HOPREV I) and polyethylene with fiber glass (HOP...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Musa, Mohd Hafiz
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/17628/
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/17628/2/TM_MOHD%20HAFIZ%20MUSA%20AS%2011_5.pdf
id uitm-17628
recordtype eprints
spelling uitm-176282019-02-27T04:09:08Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/17628/ Mechanical and physical properties of hybrid oil palm-rubberwood engineered veneer lumber (HOPREV) for furniture components / Mohd Hafiz Musa Musa, Mohd Hafiz The main objective of this study was to evaluate some of the mechanical and physical properties of Hybrid Oil Palm-Rubberwood Engineered Veneer Lumber (HOPREV). This study evaluated the affect of different binders (urea formaldehyde as control sample (HOPREV I) and polyethylene with fiber glass (HOPREV II), hot press pressures (17.24 kg/cm² (1200psi) and 25.86 kg/cm² (1800psi)) and pressing times (10 and 20 minutes) on the HOPREV. In the mechanical test, bending, shear and screw withdrawal strength were determined. Thickness swelling, water absorption, delamination and density were investigated in the physical test. Based on the results tested, HOPREV II pressed at hot press pressure of 25.86 kg/cm² (1800psi) for 10 minutes showed the best mechanical and physical properties compared to the other test samples. Both HOPREV I and II showed improvement in mechanical and physical properties as the specific pressure increase. Mechanical and physical properties of HOPREV I also become better as pressing time was increased except for HOPREV II pressed for 10 minutes that showed better properties compared to HOPREV II pressed for 20 minutes. However, both HOPREV I and HOPREV II passed the standards BS EN 312-3: 1996, BS 5669: Part 1:1989 Section Three, BS EN 314-2:1993, BS EN 312-4: 1996 and JAS 233: 2003 for interior purposes in dry condition. HOPREV II performed better, but HOPREV I would be a better choice as it would be cheaper to produce. Therefore HOPREV I could be marketed at a more competitive price. 2011 Thesis NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/17628/2/TM_MOHD%20HAFIZ%20MUSA%20AS%2011_5.pdf Musa, Mohd Hafiz (2011) Mechanical and physical properties of hybrid oil palm-rubberwood engineered veneer lumber (HOPREV) for furniture components / Mohd Hafiz Musa. Masters thesis, Universiti Teknologi MARA.
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
building UiTM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
language English
description The main objective of this study was to evaluate some of the mechanical and physical properties of Hybrid Oil Palm-Rubberwood Engineered Veneer Lumber (HOPREV). This study evaluated the affect of different binders (urea formaldehyde as control sample (HOPREV I) and polyethylene with fiber glass (HOPREV II), hot press pressures (17.24 kg/cm² (1200psi) and 25.86 kg/cm² (1800psi)) and pressing times (10 and 20 minutes) on the HOPREV. In the mechanical test, bending, shear and screw withdrawal strength were determined. Thickness swelling, water absorption, delamination and density were investigated in the physical test. Based on the results tested, HOPREV II pressed at hot press pressure of 25.86 kg/cm² (1800psi) for 10 minutes showed the best mechanical and physical properties compared to the other test samples. Both HOPREV I and II showed improvement in mechanical and physical properties as the specific pressure increase. Mechanical and physical properties of HOPREV I also become better as pressing time was increased except for HOPREV II pressed for 10 minutes that showed better properties compared to HOPREV II pressed for 20 minutes. However, both HOPREV I and HOPREV II passed the standards BS EN 312-3: 1996, BS 5669: Part 1:1989 Section Three, BS EN 314-2:1993, BS EN 312-4: 1996 and JAS 233: 2003 for interior purposes in dry condition. HOPREV II performed better, but HOPREV I would be a better choice as it would be cheaper to produce. Therefore HOPREV I could be marketed at a more competitive price.
format Thesis
author Musa, Mohd Hafiz
spellingShingle Musa, Mohd Hafiz
Mechanical and physical properties of hybrid oil palm-rubberwood engineered veneer lumber (HOPREV) for furniture components / Mohd Hafiz Musa
author_facet Musa, Mohd Hafiz
author_sort Musa, Mohd Hafiz
title Mechanical and physical properties of hybrid oil palm-rubberwood engineered veneer lumber (HOPREV) for furniture components / Mohd Hafiz Musa
title_short Mechanical and physical properties of hybrid oil palm-rubberwood engineered veneer lumber (HOPREV) for furniture components / Mohd Hafiz Musa
title_full Mechanical and physical properties of hybrid oil palm-rubberwood engineered veneer lumber (HOPREV) for furniture components / Mohd Hafiz Musa
title_fullStr Mechanical and physical properties of hybrid oil palm-rubberwood engineered veneer lumber (HOPREV) for furniture components / Mohd Hafiz Musa
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical and physical properties of hybrid oil palm-rubberwood engineered veneer lumber (HOPREV) for furniture components / Mohd Hafiz Musa
title_sort mechanical and physical properties of hybrid oil palm-rubberwood engineered veneer lumber (hoprev) for furniture components / mohd hafiz musa
publishDate 2011
url http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/17628/
http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/17628/2/TM_MOHD%20HAFIZ%20MUSA%20AS%2011_5.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T22:58:42Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T22:58:42Z
_version_ 1777418028129976320