Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.]

This study investigates the effect of soil stabilization using hydrated lime on peat soil. Hydrated lime admixtures were prepared in two different methods; namely: lime powder (dry) and lime slurry. The stabilization of soil samples were performed under three different proportions which are 3%, 6% a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Ibrahim, Anas, Abdullah, Muhammad Sofian, Jamalludin, Damanhuri, Apo, Mustan
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pulau Pinang & Pusat Penerbitan Universiti (UPENA) 2007
Subjects:	Engineering geology. Rock mechanics. Soil mechanics. Soil dynamics
Online Access:	http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14860/ http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14860/1/AJ_ANAS%20IBRAHIM%20ESTEEM%2007.pdf

id	uitm-14860
recordtype	eprints
spelling	uitm-148602016-10-06T01:42:06Z http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14860/ Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.] Ibrahim, Anas Abdullah, Muhammad Sofian Jamalludin, Damanhuri Apo, Mustan Engineering geology. Rock mechanics. Soil mechanics. Soil dynamics This study investigates the effect of soil stabilization using hydrated lime on peat soil. Hydrated lime admixtures were prepared in two different methods; namely: lime powder (dry) and lime slurry. The stabilization of soil samples were performed under three different proportions which are 3%, 6% and 9% of weight of dry peat soils. Compressive strength of stabilized peat soil under different mixtures process were evaluated by unconfined compressive stress test (UCT), and the performance of this admixture will be compared. Three different curing times are considered, namely; immediate, 3 days and 7 days curing period. Lime slurry method for peat soil stabilization is more effective compared to lime powder admixture. Results obtained from the tests shown that the Unconfined Compressive Strength values under lime slurry were increased with the increasing lime percentage and longer curing time period. The maximum improvement was 950 % under lime slurry and for 7 days curing period compared to the untreated peat soils. However the unconfined compressive strength for lime powder decreases around 60% to 63% with the increment of curing period. Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pulau Pinang & Pusat Penerbitan Universiti (UPENA) 2007 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14860/1/AJ_ANAS%20IBRAHIM%20ESTEEM%2007.pdf Ibrahim, Anas and Abdullah, Muhammad Sofian and Jamalludin, Damanhuri and Apo, Mustan (2007) Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.]. Esteem Academic Journal, 3. pp. 87-100. ISSN 1675-7939
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	Universiti Teknologi MARA
building	UiTM Institutional Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	Engineering geology. Rock mechanics. Soil mechanics. Soil dynamics
spellingShingle	Engineering geology. Rock mechanics. Soil mechanics. Soil dynamics Ibrahim, Anas Abdullah, Muhammad Sofian Jamalludin, Damanhuri Apo, Mustan Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.]
description	This study investigates the effect of soil stabilization using hydrated lime on peat soil. Hydrated lime admixtures were prepared in two different methods; namely: lime powder (dry) and lime slurry. The stabilization of soil samples were performed under three different proportions which are 3%, 6% and 9% of weight of dry peat soils. Compressive strength of stabilized peat soil under different mixtures process were evaluated by unconfined compressive stress test (UCT), and the performance of this admixture will be compared. Three different curing times are considered, namely; immediate, 3 days and 7 days curing period. Lime slurry method for peat soil stabilization is more effective compared to lime powder admixture. Results obtained from the tests shown that the Unconfined Compressive Strength values under lime slurry were increased with the increasing lime percentage and longer curing time period. The maximum improvement was 950 % under lime slurry and for 7 days curing period compared to the untreated peat soils. However the unconfined compressive strength for lime powder decreases around 60% to 63% with the increment of curing period.
format	Article
author	Ibrahim, Anas Abdullah, Muhammad Sofian Jamalludin, Damanhuri Apo, Mustan
author_facet	Ibrahim, Anas Abdullah, Muhammad Sofian Jamalludin, Damanhuri Apo, Mustan
author_sort	Ibrahim, Anas
title	Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.]
title_short	Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.]
title_full	Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.]
title_fullStr	Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.]
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.]
title_sort	comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / anas ibrahim … [et al.]
publisher	Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pulau Pinang & Pusat Penerbitan Universiti (UPENA)
publishDate	2007
url	http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14860/ http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14860/1/AJ_ANAS%20IBRAHIM%20ESTEEM%2007.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T22:52:34Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T22:52:34Z
_version_	1777417641576628224

Comparison between hydrated lime dry powder and slurry on peat soil stabilization / Anas Ibrahim … [et al.]

Similar Items