Monitoring and Evaluation for Results : Lessons from Uganda

Monitoring and Evaluation for Results : Lessons from Uganda

Recent experience with monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in Uganda has shown how M&E can be developed to contribute to national capacity building, rather than become a demanding, but unproductive data collection exercise. Symptoms of M&E...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hauge, Arild O., Mackay, Keith
Format: Brief
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2012
Subjects:
ANNUAL REPORT
ANTICORRUPTION
CAPACITY BUILDING
CIVIL SERVICE
CIVIL SOCIETY
COMMUNITIES
DEBT RELIEF
DECISION MAKING
DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS
EDUCATION
EXPENDITURES
HEALTH
HEALTH SECTOR
HEALTH SURVEYS
HEAVILY INDEBTED POOR COUNTRIES
HIPC
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
IMMUNIZATION
IMMUNIZATION COVERAGE
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY
INFANT MORTALITY
LAND USE
LEARNING
M&E ACTIVITIES
M&E CAPACITY
M&E SYSTEMS
MACROECONOMIC STABILITY
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
MANAGERS
MORTALITY
NATURAL RESOURCES
POVERTY MONITORING
POVERTY OUTCOMES
POVERTY REDUCTION
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
PUBLIC SERVICES
RADIO
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
SANITATION
SCHOOLS
SERVICE DELIVERY
TARGETING
TRANSPARENCY
WASTE
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/09/5531267/monitoring-evaluation-results-lessons-uganda
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/9683
Description
Summary:Recent experience with monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in Uganda has shown how M&E can be developed to contribute to national capacity building, rather than become a demanding, but unproductive data collection exercise. Symptoms of M&E overload have been addressed by assigning coordination responsibility to the Office of the Prime Minister. Prospects are now improving for aligning M&E capacity with strengthening cost-effectiveness and achievement of value for money in service delivery.

Similar Items