What Determines Protection of Property Rights? An Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effects

Using cross-country data, the authors evaluate historical determinants of protection of property rights. They examine four historical theories that focus on conceptually distinct causal variables believed to shape institutions: legal origin, endowments, ethnic diversity, and religion. There is only...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayyagari, Meghana, Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, Maksimovic, Vojislav
Format: Policy Research Working Paper
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2006/06/6840099/determines-protection-property-rights-analysis-direct-indirect-effects
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8446
id okr-10986-8446
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-84462021-04-23T14:02:41Z What Determines Protection of Property Rights? An Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effects Ayyagari, Meghana Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli Maksimovic, Vojislav CIVIL LAW COMMON LAW COURTS ETHNIC GROUPS ETHNICITY FAMILIES IDENTITY JUDICIARY LATIN AMERICAN LAWS LEGAL FORMALISM LEGAL PROCEDURES NORMS POWER PROPERTY RIGHTS RELIGION SOCIETIES SOUTH AMERICA TRIALS Using cross-country data, the authors evaluate historical determinants of protection of property rights. They examine four historical theories that focus on conceptually distinct causal variables believed to shape institutions: legal origin, endowments, ethnic diversity, and religion. There is only one realization of the data with relatively few observations, which have by now been well explored in the literature. Given the correlations between the explanatory variables, it is difficult to fashion empirical tests which are consistent in their treatment of the competing theories and to know which regressions to take seriously, giving rise to competing interpretations in the literature. The authors use Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) methodology to identify which historical factors are direct determinants of property rights protection and which are not, and subject the outcomes to a battery of robustness tests. The empirical results support ethnic fractionalization as a robust determinant of property rights protection. Despite the attention it has received in the literature, the impact of legal origin on protection of property rights appears fragile and dependent on the inclusion of transition economies in the sample. 2012-06-19T18:07:35Z 2012-06-19T18:07:35Z 2006-06 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2006/06/6840099/determines-protection-property-rights-analysis-direct-indirect-effects http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8446 English Policy Research Working Paper; No. 3940 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic CIVIL LAW
COMMON LAW
COURTS
ETHNIC GROUPS
ETHNICITY
FAMILIES
IDENTITY
JUDICIARY
LATIN AMERICAN
LAWS
LEGAL FORMALISM
LEGAL PROCEDURES
NORMS
POWER
PROPERTY RIGHTS
RELIGION
SOCIETIES
SOUTH AMERICA
TRIALS
spellingShingle CIVIL LAW
COMMON LAW
COURTS
ETHNIC GROUPS
ETHNICITY
FAMILIES
IDENTITY
JUDICIARY
LATIN AMERICAN
LAWS
LEGAL FORMALISM
LEGAL PROCEDURES
NORMS
POWER
PROPERTY RIGHTS
RELIGION
SOCIETIES
SOUTH AMERICA
TRIALS
Ayyagari, Meghana
Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli
Maksimovic, Vojislav
What Determines Protection of Property Rights? An Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effects
relation Policy Research Working Paper; No. 3940
description Using cross-country data, the authors evaluate historical determinants of protection of property rights. They examine four historical theories that focus on conceptually distinct causal variables believed to shape institutions: legal origin, endowments, ethnic diversity, and religion. There is only one realization of the data with relatively few observations, which have by now been well explored in the literature. Given the correlations between the explanatory variables, it is difficult to fashion empirical tests which are consistent in their treatment of the competing theories and to know which regressions to take seriously, giving rise to competing interpretations in the literature. The authors use Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) methodology to identify which historical factors are direct determinants of property rights protection and which are not, and subject the outcomes to a battery of robustness tests. The empirical results support ethnic fractionalization as a robust determinant of property rights protection. Despite the attention it has received in the literature, the impact of legal origin on protection of property rights appears fragile and dependent on the inclusion of transition economies in the sample.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
author Ayyagari, Meghana
Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli
Maksimovic, Vojislav
author_facet Ayyagari, Meghana
Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli
Maksimovic, Vojislav
author_sort Ayyagari, Meghana
title What Determines Protection of Property Rights? An Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effects
title_short What Determines Protection of Property Rights? An Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effects
title_full What Determines Protection of Property Rights? An Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effects
title_fullStr What Determines Protection of Property Rights? An Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effects
title_full_unstemmed What Determines Protection of Property Rights? An Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effects
title_sort what determines protection of property rights? an analysis of direct and indirect effects
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2012
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2006/06/6840099/determines-protection-property-rights-analysis-direct-indirect-effects
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8446
_version_ 1764406289274765312