Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs

The author critically reviews the methods available for the ex-post counterfactual analysis of programs that are assigned exclusively to individuals, households, or locations. The discussion covers both experimental and non-experimental methods (including propensity-score matching, discontinuity des...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ravallion, Martin
Format: Policy Research Working Paper
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2012
Subjects:
EGS
GDP
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/06/8962410/evaluating-anti-poverty-programs
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8341
id okr-10986-8341
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-83412021-04-23T14:02:43Z Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs Ravallion, Martin ACTIVE LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AID DONORS ANTI-POVERTY ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAMS CASH TRANSFERS CHILD MORTALITY CHILD NUTRITION COMPARISON GROUPS CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES CONTROL GROUPS COUNTERFACTUAL COUNTERFACTUALS DATA COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH DIFFERENCE ESTIMATORS ECONOMIC GROWTH EGS EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS EVALUATION DESIGN EVALUATION METHODS EVALUATORS EXPERIMENTS FARM ACTIVITIES FARMERS FIELD WORK FINANCIAL SUPPORT FLEXIBILITY FOOD CONSUMPTION GDP HEADCOUNT INDEX HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLD SIZE HOUSEHOLD SURVEY HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA IMPACT ASSESSMENT IMPACT EVALUATION IMPACT ON POVERTY IMPACTS ON POVERTY INCIDENCE OF POVERTY INCOME INCOME GAINS INEQUALITY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES INSURANCE INTERVENTION INTERVENTIONS INTERVIEWS LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS LABOR MARKETS LANDLESS HOUSEHOLDS LIVING STANDARDS LONGITUDINAL DATA MEASURES OF POVERTY MINIMUM INCOME MODELING MONITORING DATA NONEXPERIMENTAL METHODS NUTRITION NUTRITIONAL STATUS OUTCOME INDICATORS POOR POOR AREAS POOR COUNTRIES POOR FAMILIES POOR INFRASTRUCTURE POOR PEOPLE POVERTY DYNAMICS POVERTY IMPACTS POVERTY INCIDENCE POVERTY LINE POVERTY LINES POVERTY MEASURES PROGRAM COVERAGE PROGRAM EXPANSION PROGRAMS PROJECT MONITORING PUBLIC SPENDING QUANTITATIVE SURVEYS RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS RURAL RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE RURAL ROAD RURAL ROADS SANITATION SELECTION BIAS SIMULATION SIMULATION METHODS SIMULATIONS SOCIAL EXPERIMENTS SOCIAL FUNDS SOCIAL SPENDING SPECIFICATION TESTS SURVEY DATA SURVEY DESIGN TARGETING TRAINING PROGRAMS TREATMENT EFFECTS VALIDITY WAGES WEIGHTING The author critically reviews the methods available for the ex-post counterfactual analysis of programs that are assigned exclusively to individuals, households, or locations. The discussion covers both experimental and non-experimental methods (including propensity-score matching, discontinuity designs, double and triple differences, and instrumental variables). Two main lessons emerge. First, despite the claims of advocates, no single method dominates; rigorous, policy-relevant evaluations should be open-minded about methodology. Second, future efforts to draw more useful lessons from evaluations will call for more policy-relevant measures and deeper explanations of measured impacts than are possible from the classic ("black box") assessment of mean impact. 2012-06-18T20:11:35Z 2012-06-18T20:11:35Z 2005-06 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/06/8962410/evaluating-anti-poverty-programs http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8341 English Policy Research Working Paper; No. 3625 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic ACTIVE LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS
AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY
AID DONORS
ANTI-POVERTY
ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAMS
CASH TRANSFERS
CHILD MORTALITY
CHILD NUTRITION
COMPARISON GROUPS
CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES
CONTROL GROUPS
COUNTERFACTUAL
COUNTERFACTUALS
DATA COLLECTION
DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
DIFFERENCE ESTIMATORS
ECONOMIC GROWTH
EGS
EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME
EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS
EVALUATION DESIGN
EVALUATION METHODS
EVALUATORS
EXPERIMENTS
FARM ACTIVITIES
FARMERS
FIELD WORK
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
FLEXIBILITY
FOOD CONSUMPTION
GDP
HEADCOUNT INDEX
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
HOUSEHOLD SIZE
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA
IMPACT ASSESSMENT
IMPACT EVALUATION
IMPACT ON POVERTY
IMPACTS ON POVERTY
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY
INCOME
INCOME GAINS
INEQUALITY
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES
INSURANCE
INTERVENTION
INTERVENTIONS
INTERVIEWS
LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS
LABOR MARKETS
LANDLESS HOUSEHOLDS
LIVING STANDARDS
LONGITUDINAL DATA
MEASURES OF POVERTY
MINIMUM INCOME
MODELING
MONITORING DATA
NONEXPERIMENTAL METHODS
NUTRITION
NUTRITIONAL STATUS
OUTCOME INDICATORS
POOR
POOR AREAS
POOR COUNTRIES
POOR FAMILIES
POOR INFRASTRUCTURE
POOR PEOPLE
POVERTY DYNAMICS
POVERTY IMPACTS
POVERTY INCIDENCE
POVERTY LINE
POVERTY LINES
POVERTY MEASURES
PROGRAM COVERAGE
PROGRAM EXPANSION
PROGRAMS
PROJECT MONITORING
PUBLIC SPENDING
QUANTITATIVE SURVEYS
RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS
RURAL
RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE
RURAL ROAD
RURAL ROADS
SANITATION
SELECTION BIAS
SIMULATION
SIMULATION METHODS
SIMULATIONS
SOCIAL EXPERIMENTS
SOCIAL FUNDS
SOCIAL SPENDING
SPECIFICATION TESTS
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY DESIGN
TARGETING
TRAINING PROGRAMS
TREATMENT EFFECTS
VALIDITY
WAGES
WEIGHTING
spellingShingle ACTIVE LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS
AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY
AID DONORS
ANTI-POVERTY
ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAMS
CASH TRANSFERS
CHILD MORTALITY
CHILD NUTRITION
COMPARISON GROUPS
CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES
CONTROL GROUPS
COUNTERFACTUAL
COUNTERFACTUALS
DATA COLLECTION
DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
DIFFERENCE ESTIMATORS
ECONOMIC GROWTH
EGS
EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME
EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS
EVALUATION DESIGN
EVALUATION METHODS
EVALUATORS
EXPERIMENTS
FARM ACTIVITIES
FARMERS
FIELD WORK
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
FLEXIBILITY
FOOD CONSUMPTION
GDP
HEADCOUNT INDEX
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
HOUSEHOLD SIZE
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA
IMPACT ASSESSMENT
IMPACT EVALUATION
IMPACT ON POVERTY
IMPACTS ON POVERTY
INCIDENCE OF POVERTY
INCOME
INCOME GAINS
INEQUALITY
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES
INSURANCE
INTERVENTION
INTERVENTIONS
INTERVIEWS
LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS
LABOR MARKETS
LANDLESS HOUSEHOLDS
LIVING STANDARDS
LONGITUDINAL DATA
MEASURES OF POVERTY
MINIMUM INCOME
MODELING
MONITORING DATA
NONEXPERIMENTAL METHODS
NUTRITION
NUTRITIONAL STATUS
OUTCOME INDICATORS
POOR
POOR AREAS
POOR COUNTRIES
POOR FAMILIES
POOR INFRASTRUCTURE
POOR PEOPLE
POVERTY DYNAMICS
POVERTY IMPACTS
POVERTY INCIDENCE
POVERTY LINE
POVERTY LINES
POVERTY MEASURES
PROGRAM COVERAGE
PROGRAM EXPANSION
PROGRAMS
PROJECT MONITORING
PUBLIC SPENDING
QUANTITATIVE SURVEYS
RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS
RURAL
RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE
RURAL ROAD
RURAL ROADS
SANITATION
SELECTION BIAS
SIMULATION
SIMULATION METHODS
SIMULATIONS
SOCIAL EXPERIMENTS
SOCIAL FUNDS
SOCIAL SPENDING
SPECIFICATION TESTS
SURVEY DATA
SURVEY DESIGN
TARGETING
TRAINING PROGRAMS
TREATMENT EFFECTS
VALIDITY
WAGES
WEIGHTING
Ravallion, Martin
Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs
relation Policy Research Working Paper; No. 3625
description The author critically reviews the methods available for the ex-post counterfactual analysis of programs that are assigned exclusively to individuals, households, or locations. The discussion covers both experimental and non-experimental methods (including propensity-score matching, discontinuity designs, double and triple differences, and instrumental variables). Two main lessons emerge. First, despite the claims of advocates, no single method dominates; rigorous, policy-relevant evaluations should be open-minded about methodology. Second, future efforts to draw more useful lessons from evaluations will call for more policy-relevant measures and deeper explanations of measured impacts than are possible from the classic ("black box") assessment of mean impact.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
author Ravallion, Martin
author_facet Ravallion, Martin
author_sort Ravallion, Martin
title Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs
title_short Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs
title_full Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs
title_fullStr Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs
title_sort evaluating anti-poverty programs
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2012
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/06/8962410/evaluating-anti-poverty-programs
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8341
_version_ 1764408177737072640