Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs
The author critically reviews the methods available for the ex-post counterfactual analysis of programs that are assigned exclusively to individuals, households, or locations. The discussion covers both experimental and non-experimental methods (including propensity-score matching, discontinuity des...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/06/8962410/evaluating-anti-poverty-programs http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8341 |
id |
okr-10986-8341 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-83412021-04-23T14:02:43Z Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs Ravallion, Martin ACTIVE LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AID DONORS ANTI-POVERTY ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAMS CASH TRANSFERS CHILD MORTALITY CHILD NUTRITION COMPARISON GROUPS CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES CONTROL GROUPS COUNTERFACTUAL COUNTERFACTUALS DATA COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH DIFFERENCE ESTIMATORS ECONOMIC GROWTH EGS EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS EVALUATION DESIGN EVALUATION METHODS EVALUATORS EXPERIMENTS FARM ACTIVITIES FARMERS FIELD WORK FINANCIAL SUPPORT FLEXIBILITY FOOD CONSUMPTION GDP HEADCOUNT INDEX HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLD SIZE HOUSEHOLD SURVEY HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA IMPACT ASSESSMENT IMPACT EVALUATION IMPACT ON POVERTY IMPACTS ON POVERTY INCIDENCE OF POVERTY INCOME INCOME GAINS INEQUALITY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES INSURANCE INTERVENTION INTERVENTIONS INTERVIEWS LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS LABOR MARKETS LANDLESS HOUSEHOLDS LIVING STANDARDS LONGITUDINAL DATA MEASURES OF POVERTY MINIMUM INCOME MODELING MONITORING DATA NONEXPERIMENTAL METHODS NUTRITION NUTRITIONAL STATUS OUTCOME INDICATORS POOR POOR AREAS POOR COUNTRIES POOR FAMILIES POOR INFRASTRUCTURE POOR PEOPLE POVERTY DYNAMICS POVERTY IMPACTS POVERTY INCIDENCE POVERTY LINE POVERTY LINES POVERTY MEASURES PROGRAM COVERAGE PROGRAM EXPANSION PROGRAMS PROJECT MONITORING PUBLIC SPENDING QUANTITATIVE SURVEYS RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS RURAL RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE RURAL ROAD RURAL ROADS SANITATION SELECTION BIAS SIMULATION SIMULATION METHODS SIMULATIONS SOCIAL EXPERIMENTS SOCIAL FUNDS SOCIAL SPENDING SPECIFICATION TESTS SURVEY DATA SURVEY DESIGN TARGETING TRAINING PROGRAMS TREATMENT EFFECTS VALIDITY WAGES WEIGHTING The author critically reviews the methods available for the ex-post counterfactual analysis of programs that are assigned exclusively to individuals, households, or locations. The discussion covers both experimental and non-experimental methods (including propensity-score matching, discontinuity designs, double and triple differences, and instrumental variables). Two main lessons emerge. First, despite the claims of advocates, no single method dominates; rigorous, policy-relevant evaluations should be open-minded about methodology. Second, future efforts to draw more useful lessons from evaluations will call for more policy-relevant measures and deeper explanations of measured impacts than are possible from the classic ("black box") assessment of mean impact. 2012-06-18T20:11:35Z 2012-06-18T20:11:35Z 2005-06 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/06/8962410/evaluating-anti-poverty-programs http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8341 English Policy Research Working Paper; No. 3625 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English |
topic |
ACTIVE LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AID DONORS ANTI-POVERTY ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAMS CASH TRANSFERS CHILD MORTALITY CHILD NUTRITION COMPARISON GROUPS CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES CONTROL GROUPS COUNTERFACTUAL COUNTERFACTUALS DATA COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH DIFFERENCE ESTIMATORS ECONOMIC GROWTH EGS EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS EVALUATION DESIGN EVALUATION METHODS EVALUATORS EXPERIMENTS FARM ACTIVITIES FARMERS FIELD WORK FINANCIAL SUPPORT FLEXIBILITY FOOD CONSUMPTION GDP HEADCOUNT INDEX HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLD SIZE HOUSEHOLD SURVEY HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA IMPACT ASSESSMENT IMPACT EVALUATION IMPACT ON POVERTY IMPACTS ON POVERTY INCIDENCE OF POVERTY INCOME INCOME GAINS INEQUALITY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES INSURANCE INTERVENTION INTERVENTIONS INTERVIEWS LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS LABOR MARKETS LANDLESS HOUSEHOLDS LIVING STANDARDS LONGITUDINAL DATA MEASURES OF POVERTY MINIMUM INCOME MODELING MONITORING DATA NONEXPERIMENTAL METHODS NUTRITION NUTRITIONAL STATUS OUTCOME INDICATORS POOR POOR AREAS POOR COUNTRIES POOR FAMILIES POOR INFRASTRUCTURE POOR PEOPLE POVERTY DYNAMICS POVERTY IMPACTS POVERTY INCIDENCE POVERTY LINE POVERTY LINES POVERTY MEASURES PROGRAM COVERAGE PROGRAM EXPANSION PROGRAMS PROJECT MONITORING PUBLIC SPENDING QUANTITATIVE SURVEYS RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS RURAL RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE RURAL ROAD RURAL ROADS SANITATION SELECTION BIAS SIMULATION SIMULATION METHODS SIMULATIONS SOCIAL EXPERIMENTS SOCIAL FUNDS SOCIAL SPENDING SPECIFICATION TESTS SURVEY DATA SURVEY DESIGN TARGETING TRAINING PROGRAMS TREATMENT EFFECTS VALIDITY WAGES WEIGHTING |
spellingShingle |
ACTIVE LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AID DONORS ANTI-POVERTY ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAMS CASH TRANSFERS CHILD MORTALITY CHILD NUTRITION COMPARISON GROUPS CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURES CONTROL GROUPS COUNTERFACTUAL COUNTERFACTUALS DATA COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH DIFFERENCE ESTIMATORS ECONOMIC GROWTH EGS EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS EVALUATION DESIGN EVALUATION METHODS EVALUATORS EXPERIMENTS FARM ACTIVITIES FARMERS FIELD WORK FINANCIAL SUPPORT FLEXIBILITY FOOD CONSUMPTION GDP HEADCOUNT INDEX HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLD SIZE HOUSEHOLD SURVEY HOUSEHOLD SURVEY DATA IMPACT ASSESSMENT IMPACT EVALUATION IMPACT ON POVERTY IMPACTS ON POVERTY INCIDENCE OF POVERTY INCOME INCOME GAINS INEQUALITY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES INSURANCE INTERVENTION INTERVENTIONS INTERVIEWS LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS LABOR MARKETS LANDLESS HOUSEHOLDS LIVING STANDARDS LONGITUDINAL DATA MEASURES OF POVERTY MINIMUM INCOME MODELING MONITORING DATA NONEXPERIMENTAL METHODS NUTRITION NUTRITIONAL STATUS OUTCOME INDICATORS POOR POOR AREAS POOR COUNTRIES POOR FAMILIES POOR INFRASTRUCTURE POOR PEOPLE POVERTY DYNAMICS POVERTY IMPACTS POVERTY INCIDENCE POVERTY LINE POVERTY LINES POVERTY MEASURES PROGRAM COVERAGE PROGRAM EXPANSION PROGRAMS PROJECT MONITORING PUBLIC SPENDING QUANTITATIVE SURVEYS RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS RURAL RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE RURAL ROAD RURAL ROADS SANITATION SELECTION BIAS SIMULATION SIMULATION METHODS SIMULATIONS SOCIAL EXPERIMENTS SOCIAL FUNDS SOCIAL SPENDING SPECIFICATION TESTS SURVEY DATA SURVEY DESIGN TARGETING TRAINING PROGRAMS TREATMENT EFFECTS VALIDITY WAGES WEIGHTING Ravallion, Martin Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs |
relation |
Policy Research Working Paper; No. 3625 |
description |
The author critically reviews the methods available for the ex-post counterfactual analysis of programs that are assigned exclusively to individuals, households, or locations. The discussion covers both experimental and non-experimental methods (including propensity-score matching, discontinuity designs, double and triple differences, and instrumental variables). Two main lessons emerge. First, despite the claims of advocates, no single method dominates; rigorous, policy-relevant evaluations should be open-minded about methodology. Second, future efforts to draw more useful lessons from evaluations will call for more policy-relevant measures and deeper explanations of measured impacts than are possible from the classic ("black box") assessment of mean impact. |
format |
Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper |
author |
Ravallion, Martin |
author_facet |
Ravallion, Martin |
author_sort |
Ravallion, Martin |
title |
Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs |
title_short |
Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs |
title_full |
Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs |
title_sort |
evaluating anti-poverty programs |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/06/8962410/evaluating-anti-poverty-programs http://hdl.handle.net/10986/8341 |
_version_ |
1764408177737072640 |