Exports and Productivity – Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries

The authors use comparable micro level panel data for 14 countries and a set of identically specified empirical models to investigate the relationship between exports and productivity. The overall results are in line with the big picture that is by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: The International Study Group on Exports and Productivity
Format: Policy Research Working Paper
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2007/11/8799383/exports-productivity-comparable-evidence-14-countries
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7632
id okr-10986-7632
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-76322021-04-23T14:02:34Z Exports and Productivity – Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries The International Study Group on Exports and Productivity BUSINESS REGULATIONS BUYERS CAPACITY UTILIZATION COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS COMPETITORS DISCUSSION DOCUMENTS DOMESTIC MARKET DOMESTIC MARKETS ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC STATISTICS ECONOMIC SURVEYS ECONOMICS ECONOMICS LITERATURE EMPLOYEE EMPLOYMENT ENTRY BARRIER ENTRY COSTS EQUIPMENT EXPORT MARKET EXPORT MARKETS EXPORTS FIRM LEVEL FIRM PERFORMANCE FIRM SIZE FIRM TURNOVER FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT GDP GDP PER CAPITA GROWTH RATE HUMAN CAPITAL IDEA IDEAS INCOME INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY PRODUCTIVITY INSIGHTS INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON INTERNATIONAL TRADE JOBS KNOWLEDGE FLOWS LABOR PRODUCTIVITY LABOUR LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH LEARNING LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES MANUFACTURING MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES MARKETING MISSING VALUE MOTIVATION NETWORKS OPEN ECONOMIES OPEN ECONOMY PER CAPITA INCOME PERFORMANCE MEASURES PRODUCTION COSTS PRODUCTION UNIT PRODUCTIVE FIRMS PRODUCTIVITY PRODUCTIVITY DIFFERENTIAL PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS REGRESSION ANALYSIS RESULT RESULTS SELF-SELECTION HYPOTHESIS SOUTH AMERICA TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY USE VALUE USES VALUE ADDED WAGES WEB WORKER WORKERS WORLD ECONOMY The authors use comparable micro level panel data for 14 countries and a set of identically specified empirical models to investigate the relationship between exports and productivity. The overall results are in line with the big picture that is by now familiar from the literature: Exporters are more productive than non-exporters when observed and unobserved heterogeneity are controlled for, and these exporter productivity premia tend to increase with the share of exports in total sales; there is strong evidence in favour of self-selection of more productive firms into export markets, but nearly no evidence in favour of the learning-by-exporting hypothesis. The authors document that the exporter premia differ considerably across countries in identically specified empirical models. In a meta-analysis of their results the authors find that countries that are more open and have more effective government report higher productivity premia. However, the level of development per se does not appear to be an explanation for the observed cross-country differences. 2012-06-11T14:37:38Z 2012-06-11T14:37:38Z 2007-11 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2007/11/8799383/exports-productivity-comparable-evidence-14-countries http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7632 English Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4418 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic BUSINESS REGULATIONS
BUYERS
CAPACITY UTILIZATION
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
COMPETITORS
DISCUSSION
DOCUMENTS
DOMESTIC MARKET
DOMESTIC MARKETS
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC STATISTICS
ECONOMIC SURVEYS
ECONOMICS
ECONOMICS LITERATURE
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYMENT
ENTRY BARRIER
ENTRY COSTS
EQUIPMENT
EXPORT MARKET
EXPORT MARKETS
EXPORTS
FIRM LEVEL
FIRM PERFORMANCE
FIRM SIZE
FIRM TURNOVER
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
GDP
GDP PER CAPITA
GROWTH RATE
HUMAN CAPITAL
IDEA
IDEAS
INCOME
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION
INDUSTRY PRODUCTIVITY
INSIGHTS
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
JOBS
KNOWLEDGE FLOWS
LABOR PRODUCTIVITY
LABOUR
LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY
LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH
LEARNING
LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
MANUFACTURING
MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES
MARKETING
MISSING VALUE
MOTIVATION
NETWORKS
OPEN ECONOMIES
OPEN ECONOMY
PER CAPITA INCOME
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
PRODUCTION COSTS
PRODUCTION UNIT
PRODUCTIVE FIRMS
PRODUCTIVITY
PRODUCTIVITY DIFFERENTIAL
PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH
PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS
REGRESSION ANALYSIS
RESULT
RESULTS
SELF-SELECTION HYPOTHESIS
SOUTH AMERICA
TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY
USE VALUE
USES
VALUE ADDED
WAGES
WEB
WORKER
WORKERS
WORLD ECONOMY
spellingShingle BUSINESS REGULATIONS
BUYERS
CAPACITY UTILIZATION
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
COMPETITORS
DISCUSSION
DOCUMENTS
DOMESTIC MARKET
DOMESTIC MARKETS
ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC STATISTICS
ECONOMIC SURVEYS
ECONOMICS
ECONOMICS LITERATURE
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYMENT
ENTRY BARRIER
ENTRY COSTS
EQUIPMENT
EXPORT MARKET
EXPORT MARKETS
EXPORTS
FIRM LEVEL
FIRM PERFORMANCE
FIRM SIZE
FIRM TURNOVER
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
GDP
GDP PER CAPITA
GROWTH RATE
HUMAN CAPITAL
IDEA
IDEAS
INCOME
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION
INDUSTRY PRODUCTIVITY
INSIGHTS
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
JOBS
KNOWLEDGE FLOWS
LABOR PRODUCTIVITY
LABOUR
LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY
LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH
LEARNING
LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
MANUFACTURING
MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES
MARKETING
MISSING VALUE
MOTIVATION
NETWORKS
OPEN ECONOMIES
OPEN ECONOMY
PER CAPITA INCOME
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
PRODUCTION COSTS
PRODUCTION UNIT
PRODUCTIVE FIRMS
PRODUCTIVITY
PRODUCTIVITY DIFFERENTIAL
PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH
PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS
REGRESSION ANALYSIS
RESULT
RESULTS
SELF-SELECTION HYPOTHESIS
SOUTH AMERICA
TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY
USE VALUE
USES
VALUE ADDED
WAGES
WEB
WORKER
WORKERS
WORLD ECONOMY
The International Study Group on Exports and Productivity
Exports and Productivity – Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries
relation Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4418
description The authors use comparable micro level panel data for 14 countries and a set of identically specified empirical models to investigate the relationship between exports and productivity. The overall results are in line with the big picture that is by now familiar from the literature: Exporters are more productive than non-exporters when observed and unobserved heterogeneity are controlled for, and these exporter productivity premia tend to increase with the share of exports in total sales; there is strong evidence in favour of self-selection of more productive firms into export markets, but nearly no evidence in favour of the learning-by-exporting hypothesis. The authors document that the exporter premia differ considerably across countries in identically specified empirical models. In a meta-analysis of their results the authors find that countries that are more open and have more effective government report higher productivity premia. However, the level of development per se does not appear to be an explanation for the observed cross-country differences.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
author The International Study Group on Exports and Productivity
author_facet The International Study Group on Exports and Productivity
author_sort The International Study Group on Exports and Productivity
title Exports and Productivity – Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries
title_short Exports and Productivity – Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries
title_full Exports and Productivity – Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries
title_fullStr Exports and Productivity – Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries
title_full_unstemmed Exports and Productivity – Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries
title_sort exports and productivity – comparable evidence for 14 countries
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2012
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2007/11/8799383/exports-productivity-comparable-evidence-14-countries
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7632
_version_ 1764402609385373696