More Growth or Fewer Collapses? A New Look at Long Run Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa
Low and highly volatile growth define Africa's growth experience. But there is no evidence that growth volatility is associated to long term economic performance. This result may be misleading if it suggests that volatility is not important f...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2007/11/8665641/more-growth-or-fewer-collapses-new-look-long-run-growth-sub-saharan-africa http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7533 |
Summary: | Low and highly volatile growth define
Africa's growth experience. But there is no evidence
that growth volatility is associated to long term economic
performance. This result may be misleading if it suggests
that volatility is not important for economic and social
progress. In this paper we use a variant of the method
developed by Hausmann, Pritchett, and Rodrik (2005) to
identify both growth acceleration and deceleration episodes
in Africa between 1975 and 2005. The authors find that
Africa has had numerous growth acceleration episodes in the
last 30 years, but also nearly a comparable number of growth
collapses, offsetting most of the benefits of growth. Had
Africa avoided its growth collapses, it would have grown 1.7
percent a year instead of 0.7 percent, and its GDP per
capita would have been more than 30 percent higher in 2005.
The authors also find that growth accelerations and
decelerations have an asymmetric impact on human development
outcomes. Finally, our results suggest that it is easier to
identify the likely institutional and policy origins of
growth decelerations than of growth accelerations. |
---|