The Measurement of Inequality of Opportunity : Theory and an Application to Latin America
What part of the inequality observed in a particular country is due to unequal opportunities, rather than to differences in individual efforts or luck? This paper estimates a lower bound for the opportunity share of inequality in labor earnings, ho...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/07/9631175/measurement-inequality-opportunity-theory-application-latin-america http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6859 |
Summary: | What part of the inequality observed in
a particular country is due to unequal opportunities, rather
than to differences in individual efforts or luck? This
paper estimates a lower bound for the opportunity share of
inequality in labor earnings, household income per capita
and household consumption per capita in six Latin American
countries. Following John Roemer, the authors associate
inequality of opportunity with outcome differences that can
be accounted for by morally irrelevant pre-determined
circumstances, such as race, gender, place of birth, and
family background. Thus defined, unequal opportunities
account for between 24 and 50 percent of inequality in
consumption expenditure in the sample. Brazil and Central
America are more opportunity-unequal than Colombia, Ecuador,
or Peru. "Opportunity profiles," which identify
the social groups with the most limited opportunity sets,
are shown to be distinct from poverty profiles: ethnic
origin and the geography of birth are markedly more
important as determinants of opportunity deprivation than of
outcome poverty, particularly in Brazil, Guatemala, and Peru. |
---|