Evaluation in the Practice of Development

Knowledge about development effectiveness is constrained by two factors. First, the project staff in governments and international agencies who decide how much to invest in research on specific interventions are often not well informed about the re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ravallion, Martin
Format: Policy Research Working Paper
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2012
Subjects:
NGO
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/03/9056351/evaluation-practice-development
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6561
id okr-10986-6561
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-65612021-04-23T14:02:31Z Evaluation in the Practice of Development Ravallion, Martin ACADEMIC RESEARCH ADVOCACY ROLE ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAM ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAMS BENEFICIARIES CHILD LABOR CITIZENS CONTROL GROUPS CORRUPTION COUNTERFACTUAL DATA ANALYSIS DATA COLLECTION DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS DEVELOPMENT GOALS DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTIONS DEVELOPMENT POLICIES DEVELOPMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH DISSEMINATION ECONOMIC POLICIES EMPLOYMENT EVALUATION METHODS EVALUATION RESULTS EVALUATION STUDIES EVALUATION TECHNIQUES EXPERIMENTAL METHODS EXPERIMENTS FERTILITY FIELD WORK FINAL OUTCOMES FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS GLOBAL POVERTY HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS HUMAN RESOURCES IMPACT ASSESSMENT IMPACT EVALUATION INCOME INFORMATION ASYMMETRIES INFORMATION SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES INTERMEDIATE INDICATORS INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL TRADE INTERVENTION INTERVIEWS KNOWLEDGE GENERATION LABOR FORCE LABOR MARKET LEARNING LITERATURE LIVELIHOODS LIVING STANDARDS LOCAL COMMUNITIES METHODOLOGICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY MIGRATION MODELING MONITORING DATA NGO NUMBER OF PEOPLE NUTRITION NUTRITIONAL STATUS OUTCOME INDICATORS PERSISTENT POVERTY POLICY CHANGE POLICY IMPLICATIONS POLICY MAKERS POLICY RESEARCH POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER POLITICAL SUPPORT POOR NATIONS POOR PEOPLE POVERTY IMPACTS POVERTY MEASURES POVERTY MONITORING POVERTY OUTCOMES POVERTY REDUCTION POVERTY REDUCTION PROGRAMS PRACTITIONERS PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAM IMPACTS PROGRAMS PROGRESS PROJECT MONITORING PUBLIC SUPPORT PUBLISHERS QUALITATIVE RESEARCH RESEARCH AGENDA RESEARCH COMMUNITY RESEARCH FINDINGS RESEARCH NEEDS RESEARCH PROJECTS RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS RESEARCHERS SAFETY NET SCHOOLS SCIENCES SCIENTIFIC CRITERIA SCIENTIST SECONDARY SCHOOL SECONDARY SCHOOLING SELECTION BIAS SERVICE PROVIDERS SERVICE PROVISION SIMULATION SIMULATION METHODS SIMULATIONS SOCIAL IMPACT SOCIAL PROGRAMS SOCIAL RETURNS SOCIAL SCIENCE SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH SOCIAL SCIENCES SOCIAL WELFARE SPILLOVER SURVEY DATA TARGETING TREATMENT EFFECTS TUITION UNIVERSITY COLLEGE VALIDITY VILLAGE CHARACTERISTICS WORKERS Knowledge about development effectiveness is constrained by two factors. First, the project staff in governments and international agencies who decide how much to invest in research on specific interventions are often not well informed about the returns to rigorous evaluation and (even when they are) cannot be expected to take full account of the external benefits to others from new knowledge. This leads to under-investment in evaluative research. Second, while standard methods of impact evaluation are useful, they often leave many questions about development effectiveness unanswered. The paper proposes ten steps for making evaluations more relevant to the needs of practitioners. It is argued that more attention needs to be given to identifying policy-relevant questions (including the case for intervention); that a broader approach should be taken to the problems of internal validity; and that the problems of external validity (including scaling up) merit more attention. 2012-05-29T17:19:25Z 2012-05-29T17:19:25Z 2008-03 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/03/9056351/evaluation-practice-development http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6561 English Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4547 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic ACADEMIC RESEARCH
ADVOCACY ROLE
ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAM
ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAMS
BENEFICIARIES
CHILD LABOR
CITIZENS
CONTROL GROUPS
CORRUPTION
COUNTERFACTUAL
DATA ANALYSIS
DATA COLLECTION
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTIONS
DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
DEVELOPMENT POLICY
DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
DISSEMINATION
ECONOMIC POLICIES
EMPLOYMENT
EVALUATION METHODS
EVALUATION RESULTS
EVALUATION STUDIES
EVALUATION TECHNIQUES
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
EXPERIMENTS
FERTILITY
FIELD WORK
FINAL OUTCOMES
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
GLOBAL POVERTY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
HUMAN RESOURCES
IMPACT ASSESSMENT
IMPACT EVALUATION
INCOME
INFORMATION ASYMMETRIES
INFORMATION SYSTEM
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES
INTERMEDIATE INDICATORS
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
INTERVENTION
INTERVIEWS
KNOWLEDGE GENERATION
LABOR FORCE
LABOR MARKET
LEARNING
LITERATURE
LIVELIHOODS
LIVING STANDARDS
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
METHODOLOGICAL RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
MIGRATION
MODELING
MONITORING DATA
NGO
NUMBER OF PEOPLE
NUTRITION
NUTRITIONAL STATUS
OUTCOME INDICATORS
PERSISTENT POVERTY
POLICY CHANGE
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
POLICY MAKERS
POLICY RESEARCH
POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER
POLITICAL SUPPORT
POOR NATIONS
POOR PEOPLE
POVERTY IMPACTS
POVERTY MEASURES
POVERTY MONITORING
POVERTY OUTCOMES
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY REDUCTION PROGRAMS
PRACTITIONERS
PROGRAM EVALUATION
PROGRAM IMPACTS
PROGRAMS
PROGRESS
PROJECT MONITORING
PUBLIC SUPPORT
PUBLISHERS
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
RESEARCH AGENDA
RESEARCH COMMUNITY
RESEARCH FINDINGS
RESEARCH NEEDS
RESEARCH PROJECTS
RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS
RESEARCHERS
SAFETY NET
SCHOOLS
SCIENCES
SCIENTIFIC CRITERIA
SCIENTIST
SECONDARY SCHOOL
SECONDARY SCHOOLING
SELECTION BIAS
SERVICE PROVIDERS
SERVICE PROVISION
SIMULATION
SIMULATION METHODS
SIMULATIONS
SOCIAL IMPACT
SOCIAL PROGRAMS
SOCIAL RETURNS
SOCIAL SCIENCE
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL WELFARE
SPILLOVER
SURVEY DATA
TARGETING
TREATMENT EFFECTS
TUITION
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
VALIDITY
VILLAGE CHARACTERISTICS
WORKERS
spellingShingle ACADEMIC RESEARCH
ADVOCACY ROLE
ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAM
ANTIPOVERTY PROGRAMS
BENEFICIARIES
CHILD LABOR
CITIZENS
CONTROL GROUPS
CORRUPTION
COUNTERFACTUAL
DATA ANALYSIS
DATA COLLECTION
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS
DEVELOPMENT GOALS
DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTIONS
DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
DEVELOPMENT POLICY
DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
DISSEMINATION
ECONOMIC POLICIES
EMPLOYMENT
EVALUATION METHODS
EVALUATION RESULTS
EVALUATION STUDIES
EVALUATION TECHNIQUES
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
EXPERIMENTS
FERTILITY
FIELD WORK
FINAL OUTCOMES
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
GLOBAL POVERTY
HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
HUMAN RESOURCES
IMPACT ASSESSMENT
IMPACT EVALUATION
INCOME
INFORMATION ASYMMETRIES
INFORMATION SYSTEM
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES
INTERMEDIATE INDICATORS
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
INTERVENTION
INTERVIEWS
KNOWLEDGE GENERATION
LABOR FORCE
LABOR MARKET
LEARNING
LITERATURE
LIVELIHOODS
LIVING STANDARDS
LOCAL COMMUNITIES
METHODOLOGICAL RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
MIGRATION
MODELING
MONITORING DATA
NGO
NUMBER OF PEOPLE
NUTRITION
NUTRITIONAL STATUS
OUTCOME INDICATORS
PERSISTENT POVERTY
POLICY CHANGE
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
POLICY MAKERS
POLICY RESEARCH
POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER
POLITICAL SUPPORT
POOR NATIONS
POOR PEOPLE
POVERTY IMPACTS
POVERTY MEASURES
POVERTY MONITORING
POVERTY OUTCOMES
POVERTY REDUCTION
POVERTY REDUCTION PROGRAMS
PRACTITIONERS
PROGRAM EVALUATION
PROGRAM IMPACTS
PROGRAMS
PROGRESS
PROJECT MONITORING
PUBLIC SUPPORT
PUBLISHERS
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
RESEARCH AGENDA
RESEARCH COMMUNITY
RESEARCH FINDINGS
RESEARCH NEEDS
RESEARCH PROJECTS
RESEARCH WORKING PAPERS
RESEARCHERS
SAFETY NET
SCHOOLS
SCIENCES
SCIENTIFIC CRITERIA
SCIENTIST
SECONDARY SCHOOL
SECONDARY SCHOOLING
SELECTION BIAS
SERVICE PROVIDERS
SERVICE PROVISION
SIMULATION
SIMULATION METHODS
SIMULATIONS
SOCIAL IMPACT
SOCIAL PROGRAMS
SOCIAL RETURNS
SOCIAL SCIENCE
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL WELFARE
SPILLOVER
SURVEY DATA
TARGETING
TREATMENT EFFECTS
TUITION
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
VALIDITY
VILLAGE CHARACTERISTICS
WORKERS
Ravallion, Martin
Evaluation in the Practice of Development
relation Policy Research Working Paper; No. 4547
description Knowledge about development effectiveness is constrained by two factors. First, the project staff in governments and international agencies who decide how much to invest in research on specific interventions are often not well informed about the returns to rigorous evaluation and (even when they are) cannot be expected to take full account of the external benefits to others from new knowledge. This leads to under-investment in evaluative research. Second, while standard methods of impact evaluation are useful, they often leave many questions about development effectiveness unanswered. The paper proposes ten steps for making evaluations more relevant to the needs of practitioners. It is argued that more attention needs to be given to identifying policy-relevant questions (including the case for intervention); that a broader approach should be taken to the problems of internal validity; and that the problems of external validity (including scaling up) merit more attention.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
author Ravallion, Martin
author_facet Ravallion, Martin
author_sort Ravallion, Martin
title Evaluation in the Practice of Development
title_short Evaluation in the Practice of Development
title_full Evaluation in the Practice of Development
title_fullStr Evaluation in the Practice of Development
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation in the Practice of Development
title_sort evaluation in the practice of development
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2012
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2008/03/9056351/evaluation-practice-development
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6561
_version_ 1764400491229347840