Improving Primary Health Care Delivery in Nigeria : Evidence from Four States
This study aims mainly at understanding the performance of primary health care (PHC) providers in four Nigerian states and the variables driving this performance. The study is primarily based on quantitative surveys at the level of primary health c...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Publication |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000333037_20100415012325 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2437 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5958 |
Summary: | This study aims mainly at understanding
the performance of primary health care (PHC) providers in
four Nigerian states and the variables driving this
performance. The study is primarily based on quantitative
surveys at the level of primary health care facilities,
health care personnel, and households in their vicinity.
These surveys were implemented in four states: Bauchi, Cross
River, Kaduna, and Lagos. This study represents the second
phase of the Nigeria Health, Nutrition, and Population
Country Status Report (CSR). The first phase aimed at
analyzing the health situation of the poor and how the
health system was performing in terms of meeting their
needs. This first phase identified PHC as the weakest chain
in the entire health sector and the level of care the poor
use the most. This second phase of the CSR is therefore
focused on the analysis of the delivery of PHC services. In
contrast to the first phase, this study is mainly based on
primary data, data collected through facility, health
personnel, and household surveys. This study follows a
similar methodology used by a facility survey implemented in
Kogi and Lagos in 2002 (Das Gupta, Gauri, and Khemani,
2003). However, this study is focused in the collection of
information not previously available, such as detailed roles
and responsibilities of the LGA and states and community
perceptions of PHC services. |
---|