Response to 'What Do the Worldwide Governance Indicators Measure?'
Thomas (2009) dismisses the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) as an 'elaborate and unsupported hypothesis' because of the failure to demonstrate the 'construct validity' of these indicators. We argue that 'construct validity' is not a useful tool to assess the merit...
Main Authors: | Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart, Mastruzzi, Massimo |
---|---|
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5897 |
Similar Items
-
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Six, One, or None?
by: Langbein, Laura, et al.
Published: (2012) -
When Do Legislators Pass on Pork? The Role of Political Parties in Determining Legislator Effort
by: Keefer, Philip, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Political Violence and Underdevelopment
by: Bodea, Cristina, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Exiting a Lawless State
by: Hoff, Karla, et al.
Published: (2012) -
The Politics of Service Delivery in Pakistan: Political Parties and the Incentives for Patronage, 1988-1999
by: Hasnain, Zahid
Published: (2012)