On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil

Recent debate on the reasons for the informal sector has led to renewed focus on how to operationalize the measurement of informal employment. This paper investigates congruence between three empirical measures of the rate of informality using Brazilian household survey data for the period 1992-2004...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henley, Andrew, Arabsheibani, G. Reza, Carneiro, Francisco G.
Format: Journal Article
Language:EN
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5831
id okr-10986-5831
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-58312021-04-23T14:02:23Z On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil Henley, Andrew Arabsheibani, G. Reza Carneiro, Francisco G. Informal Economy Underground Economy E260 Formal and Informal Sectors Shadow Economy Institutional Arrangements O170 Recent debate on the reasons for the informal sector has led to renewed focus on how to operationalize the measurement of informal employment. This paper investigates congruence between three empirical measures of the rate of informality using Brazilian household survey data for the period 1992-2004. Sixty-three percent of the economically active are informal according to at least one definition, but only 40% are informal according to all three. Regression analysis is used to shed further light on differences in these measures. Appropriate measurement is therefore of high significance to policy analysis and design of appropriate strategies to reduce informality. 2012-03-30T07:34:45Z 2012-03-30T07:34:45Z 2009 Journal Article World Development 0305750X http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5831 EN http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo World Bank Journal Article Brazil
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language EN
topic Informal Economy
Underground Economy E260
Formal and Informal Sectors
Shadow Economy
Institutional Arrangements O170
spellingShingle Informal Economy
Underground Economy E260
Formal and Informal Sectors
Shadow Economy
Institutional Arrangements O170
Henley, Andrew
Arabsheibani, G. Reza
Carneiro, Francisco G.
On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil
geographic_facet Brazil
relation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo
description Recent debate on the reasons for the informal sector has led to renewed focus on how to operationalize the measurement of informal employment. This paper investigates congruence between three empirical measures of the rate of informality using Brazilian household survey data for the period 1992-2004. Sixty-three percent of the economically active are informal according to at least one definition, but only 40% are informal according to all three. Regression analysis is used to shed further light on differences in these measures. Appropriate measurement is therefore of high significance to policy analysis and design of appropriate strategies to reduce informality.
format Journal Article
author Henley, Andrew
Arabsheibani, G. Reza
Carneiro, Francisco G.
author_facet Henley, Andrew
Arabsheibani, G. Reza
Carneiro, Francisco G.
author_sort Henley, Andrew
title On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil
title_short On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil
title_full On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil
title_fullStr On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil
title_full_unstemmed On Defining and Measuring the Informal Sector: Evidence from Brazil
title_sort on defining and measuring the informal sector: evidence from brazil
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5831
_version_ 1764396473086115840