Land Registration, Governance, and Development : Evidence and Implications for Policy

The developmental impact of institutions to establish and maintain secure property rights to land has been a subject of much debate. The authors review the literature on the impact of land administration interventions in specific contexts, highlighting the dependence of outcomes on the governance en...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deininger, Klaus, Feder, Gershon
Format: Journal Article
Published: World Bank 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4430
id okr-10986-4430
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-44302021-04-23T14:02:17Z Land Registration, Governance, and Development : Evidence and Implications for Policy Deininger, Klaus Feder, Gershon access to information arable land asymmetric information credit rationing economic development economic growth economies of scale economists environmental environmental amenities equilibrium expenditures externalities land use negative externalities perfect information political economy property rights tax revenue transaction costs The developmental impact of institutions to establish and maintain secure property rights to land has been a subject of much debate. The authors review the literature on the impact of land administration interventions in specific contexts, highlighting the dependence of outcomes on the governance environment, the effectiveness of the state apparatus, and the distribution of socio-economic power. There is evidence, albeit not uniform, of enhancement of tenure security through land registration with benefits manifesting themselves in higher levels of investment and productivity and a reduced need to defend land rights. Land registration has also been shown to increase activity in land rental markets, leading to higher efficiency overall. Evidence of improved access to credit, due to formalization of land rights, is scant. Even in situations where land registration had positive benefits, the literature contains little rigorous analysis of cost-effectiveness and long-term sustainability of impacts. The authors conclude that formalization of land rights should not be viewed as a panacea and that interventions should be decided only after a careful diagnosis of the policy, social, and governance environment. If intervention is justified, the performance of land administration systems needs to be benchmarked in terms of coverage, cost-effectiveness, and quality of service provision. 2012-03-30T07:12:34Z 2012-03-30T07:12:34Z 2009-09-30 Journal Article World Bank Research Observer 1564-6971 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4430 CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank Journal Article
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
topic access to information
arable land
asymmetric information
credit rationing
economic development
economic growth
economies of scale
economists
environmental
environmental amenities
equilibrium
expenditures
externalities
land use
negative externalities
perfect information
political economy
property rights
tax revenue
transaction costs
spellingShingle access to information
arable land
asymmetric information
credit rationing
economic development
economic growth
economies of scale
economists
environmental
environmental amenities
equilibrium
expenditures
externalities
land use
negative externalities
perfect information
political economy
property rights
tax revenue
transaction costs
Deininger, Klaus
Feder, Gershon
Land Registration, Governance, and Development : Evidence and Implications for Policy
description The developmental impact of institutions to establish and maintain secure property rights to land has been a subject of much debate. The authors review the literature on the impact of land administration interventions in specific contexts, highlighting the dependence of outcomes on the governance environment, the effectiveness of the state apparatus, and the distribution of socio-economic power. There is evidence, albeit not uniform, of enhancement of tenure security through land registration with benefits manifesting themselves in higher levels of investment and productivity and a reduced need to defend land rights. Land registration has also been shown to increase activity in land rental markets, leading to higher efficiency overall. Evidence of improved access to credit, due to formalization of land rights, is scant. Even in situations where land registration had positive benefits, the literature contains little rigorous analysis of cost-effectiveness and long-term sustainability of impacts. The authors conclude that formalization of land rights should not be viewed as a panacea and that interventions should be decided only after a careful diagnosis of the policy, social, and governance environment. If intervention is justified, the performance of land administration systems needs to be benchmarked in terms of coverage, cost-effectiveness, and quality of service provision.
format Journal Article
author Deininger, Klaus
Feder, Gershon
author_facet Deininger, Klaus
Feder, Gershon
author_sort Deininger, Klaus
title Land Registration, Governance, and Development : Evidence and Implications for Policy
title_short Land Registration, Governance, and Development : Evidence and Implications for Policy
title_full Land Registration, Governance, and Development : Evidence and Implications for Policy
title_fullStr Land Registration, Governance, and Development : Evidence and Implications for Policy
title_full_unstemmed Land Registration, Governance, and Development : Evidence and Implications for Policy
title_sort land registration, governance, and development : evidence and implications for policy
publisher World Bank
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4430
_version_ 1764391325488119808