Why Don’t We See Poverty Convergence?
We are not seeing faster progress against poverty amongst the poorest developing countries. Yet this is implied by widely accepted "stylized facts" about the development process. The paper tries to explain what is missing from those styli...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20110407140818 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4352 |
Summary: | We are not seeing faster progress
against poverty amongst the poorest developing countries.
Yet this is implied by widely accepted "stylized
facts" about the development process. The paper tries
to explain what is missing from those stylized facts.
Consistently with models of economic growth incorporating
borrowing constraints, the analysis of a new data set for
100 developing countries reveals an adverse effect on
consumption growth of high initial poverty incidence at a
given initial mean. A high incidence of poverty also entails
a lower subsequent rate of progress against poverty at any
given growth rate (and poor countries tend to experience
less steep increases in poverty during recessions). Thus,
for many poor countries, the growth advantage of starting
out with a low mean ("conditional convergence") is
lost due to their high poverty rates. The size of the middle
class--measured by developing-country, not Western,
standards--appears to be an important channel linking
current poverty to subsequent growth and poverty reduction.
However, high current inequality is only a handicap if it
entails a high incidence of poverty relative to mean consumption. |
---|