State Financial Institutions : Mandates, Governance, and Beyond
There is no doubt that on average the performance of state financial institutions around the world has been below the lowest expectations. Lack of governance, management skills, regulation, and transparency, and misguided incentives have contribute...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20091130094556 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4334 |
Summary: | There is no doubt that on average the
performance of state financial institutions around the world
has been below the lowest expectations. Lack of governance,
management skills, regulation, and transparency, and
misguided incentives have contributed to discredit these
institutions for supporting the development of local
financial markets. However, the pro-active role that some
state financial institutions have played in the recent
crisis in allocating credit to sectors cyclically not
attractive for commercial banks has brought back the
question of whether some state ownership in the banking
system would be preferable. This paper analyzes the
experience of four state financial institutions that have
performed relatively well in the past: Canada's
Business Development Bank, Chile's BancoEstado, South
Africa's Development Bank of Southern Africa, and
Finland's Finnvera plc. The author finds that these
institutions have different checks and balances to mitigate
eventual mismanagement of resources. The author also finds
that little progress has been made in measuring the policy
performance of these institutions. |
---|