How Will Changes in Globalization Impact Growth in South Asia?
The current global crisis may change globalization itself, as both developed and developing countries adjust to global imbalances that contributed to the crisis. Will these changes help or hinder economic recovery and growth in South Asia? This is...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20091014162658 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4271 |
Summary: | The current global crisis may change
globalization itself, as both developed and developing
countries adjust to global imbalances that contributed to
the crisis. Will these changes help or hinder economic
recovery and growth in South Asia? This is the focus of this
paper. The three models of globalization--trade, capital,
and economic management--may not be the same in the future.
Changes in globalization could change the composition of
trade flows, capital flows, and economic management, which
in turn, could accelerate or restrain growth. South Asia is
somewhat peculiar and different from other regions in how it
has globalized, although there is a lot of diversity within
the region. Its trade characteristics are different.
India's growth has been spearheaded by exports of
modern services and less by goods exports. Modern service
trade tends to be more resilient compared with goods trade.
Globalization of services is still at an early stage. So, as
consumers pull back in the United States, service trade is
likely to be less impacted compared to goods trade. Trade
also contributes to growth through knowledge spillovers,
externalities, and learning. The global crisis has not
reduced the stock of global knowledge. Changes in capital
flows are also not likely to have a big impact on growth in
South Asia, as South Asia's investments are largely
driven by domestic savings. Its dependence on foreign
capital is low. South Asia has attracted capital flows that
are less volatile. Remittances, which are more resilient,
have been the dominant form of capital inflows, exceeding
foreign direct investment and other inflows.This global
downturn calls for counter-cyclical economic management. But
South Asia has limited room for fiscal stimulus, given high
debt-to-gross domestic product ratios. Nevertheless, reduced
commodity prices have created some fiscal space that can be
used for growth enabling infrastructure and safety nets. As
South Asia undergoes structural transformation, the region
is well positioned to bounce back with global economic recovery. |
---|