Frame-of-Reference Bias in Subjective Welfare Regressions

Past research has found that subjective questions about an individuals' economic status do not correspond closely to measures of economic welfare based on household income or consumption. Survey respondents undoubtedly hold diverse ideas about...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beegle, Kathleen, Himelein, Kristen, Ravallion, Martin
Format: Policy Research Working Paper
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20090929133925
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4258
id okr-10986-4258
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-42582021-04-23T14:02:16Z Frame-of-Reference Bias in Subjective Welfare Regressions Beegle, Kathleen Himelein, Kristen Ravallion, Martin AGRICULTURE DESCRIPTION DEVELOPMENT ISSUES DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH DIET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE ECONOMIC RESEARCH ECONOMIC REVIEW ECONOMICS EMPLOYMENT STATUS EXTREME POOR HOUSEHOLDS EXTREME POVERTY FARMLAND FEMALE FEMALE HEADED HOUSEHOLDS FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS FISH FOOD POVERTY FOOD POVERTY LINE FOOD SECURITY FOOD SPENDING GENDER HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS HOUSEHOLD CONTROLS HOUSEHOLD DEMOGRAPHICS HOUSEHOLD HEAD HOUSEHOLD HEAD AGE HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLD SIZE HOUSEHOLD SURVEY INCOME DISTRIBUTION INCOME EFFECT INCOME INEQUALITY INCOME LEVELS INCOMES INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINE LIVESTOCK LIVING CONDITIONS LIVING STANDARDS LIVING STANDARDS MEASUREMENT LIVING STANDARDS SURVEY MEASURING POVERTY NON-FOOD COMPONENT OCCUPATION PER CAPITA INCOME PERMANENT INCOME POLICY RESEARCH POOR POOR AREAS POOR HOUSEHOLDS POOR PEOPLE POOR PERSON POVERTY LINE PUBLIC GOOD PURCHASING POWER REAL INCOME RURAL SOCIAL SCIENCES SUBJECTIVE POVERTY UNEMPLOYMENT URBAN AREAS UTILITY FUNCTION WEALTH WELFARE COMPARISONS WELFARE FUNCTION Past research has found that subjective questions about an individuals' economic status do not correspond closely to measures of economic welfare based on household income or consumption. Survey respondents undoubtedly hold diverse ideas about what it means to be "poor" or "rich." Further, this heterogeneity may be correlated with other characteristics, including welfare, leading to frame-of-reference bias. To test for this bias, vignettes were added to a nationally representative survey of Tajikistan, in which survey respondents rank the economic status of the theoretical vignette households, as well as their own. The vignette rankings are used to reveal the respondent's own scale. The findings indicate that respondents hold diverse scales in assessing their welfare, but that there is little bias in either the economic gradient of subjective welfare or most other coefficients on covariates of interest. These results provide a firmer foundation for standard survey methods and regression specifications for subjective welfare data. 2012-03-19T19:12:45Z 2012-03-19T19:12:45Z 2009-04-01 http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20090929133925 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4258 English Paper is funded by the Knowledge for Change Program (KCP),Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 4904 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper The World Region The World Region
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic AGRICULTURE
DESCRIPTION
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
DIET
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
ECONOMIC REVIEW
ECONOMICS
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
EXTREME POOR HOUSEHOLDS
EXTREME POVERTY
FARMLAND
FEMALE
FEMALE HEADED HOUSEHOLDS
FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS
FISH
FOOD POVERTY
FOOD POVERTY LINE
FOOD SECURITY
FOOD SPENDING
GENDER
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
HOUSEHOLD CONTROLS
HOUSEHOLD DEMOGRAPHICS
HOUSEHOLD HEAD
HOUSEHOLD HEAD AGE
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
HOUSEHOLD SIZE
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
INCOME EFFECT
INCOME INEQUALITY
INCOME LEVELS
INCOMES
INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINE
LIVESTOCK
LIVING CONDITIONS
LIVING STANDARDS
LIVING STANDARDS MEASUREMENT
LIVING STANDARDS SURVEY
MEASURING POVERTY
NON-FOOD COMPONENT
OCCUPATION
PER CAPITA INCOME
PERMANENT INCOME
POLICY RESEARCH
POOR
POOR AREAS
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POOR PEOPLE
POOR PERSON
POVERTY LINE
PUBLIC GOOD
PURCHASING POWER
REAL INCOME
RURAL
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SUBJECTIVE POVERTY
UNEMPLOYMENT
URBAN AREAS
UTILITY FUNCTION
WEALTH
WELFARE COMPARISONS
WELFARE FUNCTION
spellingShingle AGRICULTURE
DESCRIPTION
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
DIET
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
ECONOMIC REVIEW
ECONOMICS
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
EXTREME POOR HOUSEHOLDS
EXTREME POVERTY
FARMLAND
FEMALE
FEMALE HEADED HOUSEHOLDS
FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS
FISH
FOOD POVERTY
FOOD POVERTY LINE
FOOD SECURITY
FOOD SPENDING
GENDER
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
HOUSEHOLD CONTROLS
HOUSEHOLD DEMOGRAPHICS
HOUSEHOLD HEAD
HOUSEHOLD HEAD AGE
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
HOUSEHOLD SIZE
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY
INCOME DISTRIBUTION
INCOME EFFECT
INCOME INEQUALITY
INCOME LEVELS
INCOMES
INTERNATIONAL POVERTY LINE
LIVESTOCK
LIVING CONDITIONS
LIVING STANDARDS
LIVING STANDARDS MEASUREMENT
LIVING STANDARDS SURVEY
MEASURING POVERTY
NON-FOOD COMPONENT
OCCUPATION
PER CAPITA INCOME
PERMANENT INCOME
POLICY RESEARCH
POOR
POOR AREAS
POOR HOUSEHOLDS
POOR PEOPLE
POOR PERSON
POVERTY LINE
PUBLIC GOOD
PURCHASING POWER
REAL INCOME
RURAL
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SUBJECTIVE POVERTY
UNEMPLOYMENT
URBAN AREAS
UTILITY FUNCTION
WEALTH
WELFARE COMPARISONS
WELFARE FUNCTION
Beegle, Kathleen
Himelein, Kristen
Ravallion, Martin
Frame-of-Reference Bias in Subjective Welfare Regressions
geographic_facet The World Region
The World Region
relation Paper is funded by the Knowledge for Change Program (KCP),Policy Research working paper ; no. WPS 4904
description Past research has found that subjective questions about an individuals' economic status do not correspond closely to measures of economic welfare based on household income or consumption. Survey respondents undoubtedly hold diverse ideas about what it means to be "poor" or "rich." Further, this heterogeneity may be correlated with other characteristics, including welfare, leading to frame-of-reference bias. To test for this bias, vignettes were added to a nationally representative survey of Tajikistan, in which survey respondents rank the economic status of the theoretical vignette households, as well as their own. The vignette rankings are used to reveal the respondent's own scale. The findings indicate that respondents hold diverse scales in assessing their welfare, but that there is little bias in either the economic gradient of subjective welfare or most other coefficients on covariates of interest. These results provide a firmer foundation for standard survey methods and regression specifications for subjective welfare data.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
author Beegle, Kathleen
Himelein, Kristen
Ravallion, Martin
author_facet Beegle, Kathleen
Himelein, Kristen
Ravallion, Martin
author_sort Beegle, Kathleen
title Frame-of-Reference Bias in Subjective Welfare Regressions
title_short Frame-of-Reference Bias in Subjective Welfare Regressions
title_full Frame-of-Reference Bias in Subjective Welfare Regressions
title_fullStr Frame-of-Reference Bias in Subjective Welfare Regressions
title_full_unstemmed Frame-of-Reference Bias in Subjective Welfare Regressions
title_sort frame-of-reference bias in subjective welfare regressions
publishDate 2012
url http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20090929133925
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4258
_version_ 1764390630421692416