Criss-Crossing Globalization : Uphill Flows of Skill-Intensive Goods and Foreign Direct Investment
This paper documents an unusual and possibly significant phenomenon: the export of skills, embodied in goods, services or capital from poorer to richer countries. The authors first present a set of stylized facts. Then, using a measure that combine...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20090910134156 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4239 |
Summary: | This paper documents an unusual and
possibly significant phenomenon: the export of skills,
embodied in goods, services or capital from poorer to richer
countries. The authors first present a set of stylized
facts. Then, using a measure that combines the
sophistication of a country s exports with the average
income level of destination countries, they show that the
performance of a number of developing countries - notably
China, Mexico and South Africa - matches that of much more
advanced countries - such as Japan, Spain and the United
States. The authors create a new combined dataset on foreign
direct investment (covering greenfield investment as well as
mergers and acquisitions). The analysis shows that flows of
foreign direct investment to developed countries from
developing countries - like Brazil, India, Malaysia and
South Africa - as a share of their GDP, are as large as
flows from developed countries - like Japan, Korea and the
United States. The authors suggest that it is not just the
composition of exports but their destination that matters.
In both cross-sectional and panel regressions, with a range
of controls, a measure of uphill flows of sophisticated
goods is significantly associated with better growth
performance. These results suggest the need for a deeper
analysis of whether the benefits of development might derive
not from deifying comparative advantage but from defying it. |
---|