The Crisis-Resilience of Services Trade
Much attention has focused on the impact of the current crisis on goods trade; hardly any on its impact on services trade. Using new trade data from the United States, and more aggregate data from other OECD countries, the authors show that service...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20090428090316 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/4108 |
Summary: | Much attention has focused on the impact
of the current crisis on goods trade; hardly any on its
impact on services trade. Using new trade data from the
United States, and more aggregate data from other OECD
countries, the authors show that services trade is
weathering the current crisis much better than goods trade.
As of February 2009, the value of US goods imports had
declined year-on-year by 33 percent and the value of goods
exports by 21 percent; services imports and exports each had
declined by less than 7 percent. Within services,
interesting patterns are emerging. Trade in goods-related
transport services and crisis-related financial services has
shrunk, as has expenditure on tourism abroad. But trade in a
range of business, professional, and technical services is
still increasing, with US exports growing even faster (at 10
percent) than US imports (at 7 percent). Developing
countries like India, which are relatively specialized in
business process outsourcing and information technology
services, have suffered much smaller declines in total
exports to the United States than countries like Brazil and
China and regions like Africa, which are specialized in
exports of goods, transport services, or tourism services.
On the basis of new evidence from Indian services exporters,
the authors suggest that services trade is buoyant relative
to goods trade for two reasons: demand for a range of traded
services is less cyclical, and services trade and production
are less dependent on external finance. Even though few
explicitly protectionist measures have so far been taken in
services, the changing political climate and the widening
boundaries of the state in crisis countries may introduce a
national bias in firms' procurement and location choices. |
---|