Troubling Tradeoffs in the Human Development Index
The 20th Human Development Report has introduced a new version of its famous Human Development Index (HDI). The HDI aggregates country-level attainments in life expectancy, schooling and income per capita. Each year's rankings by the HDI are k...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20101129085041 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3967 |
Summary: | The 20th Human Development Report has
introduced a new version of its famous Human Development
Index (HDI). The HDI aggregates country-level attainments in
life expectancy, schooling and income per capita. Each
year's rankings by the HDI are keenly watched in both
rich and poor countries. The main change in the 2010 HDI is
that it relaxes its past assumption of perfect
substitutability between its three components. However, most
users will probably not realize that the new HDI has also
greatly reduced its implicit weight on longevity in poor
countries, relative to rich ones. A poor country
experiencing falling life expectancy due to (say) a collapse
in its health-care system could still see its HDI improve
with even a small rate of economic growth. By contrast, the
new HDI's valuations of the gains from extra schooling
seem unreasonably high -- many times greater than the
economic returns to schooling. These troubling tradeoffs
could have been largely avoided using a different
aggregation function for the HDI, while still allowing
imperfect substitution. While some difficult value judgments
are faced in constructing and assessing the HDI, making its
assumed tradeoffs more explicit would be a welcome step. |
---|