Are Banks Too Big to Fail or Too Big to Save? International Evidence from Equity Prices and CDS Spreads
Deteriorating public finances around the world raise doubts about countries' abilities to bail out their largest banks. For an international sample of banks, this paper investigates the impact of government indebtedness and deficits on bank st...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20100719151708 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3844 |
Summary: | Deteriorating public finances around the
world raise doubts about countries' abilities to bail
out their largest banks. For an international sample of
banks, this paper investigates the impact of government
indebtedness and deficits on bank stock prices and credit
default swap spreads. Overall, bank stock prices reflect a
negative capitalization of government debt and they respond
negatively to deficits. The authors present evidence that in
2008 systemically large banks saw a reduction in their
market valuation in countries running large fiscal deficits.
Furthermore, the change in bank credit default swap spreads
in 2008 relative to 2007 reflects countries'
deterioration of public deficits. The results of the
analysis suggest that some systemically important banks can
increase their value by downsizing or splitting up, as they
have become too big to save, potentially reversing the trend
to ever larger banks. The paper also documents that a
smaller proportion of banks are systemically important --
relative to gross domestic product -- in 2008 than in the
two previous years, which could reflect private incentives
to downsize. |
---|