Private But Misunderstood? : Evidence on Measuring Intimate Partner Violence via Self-Interviewing in Rural Liberia and Malawi

Women may under-report intimate partner violence (IPV) due to several social and psychological factors. This study conducts a measurement experiment in rural Liberia and Malawi in which women were asked IPV questions via self-interviewing (SI) or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Park, David Sungho, Aggarwal, Shilpa, Jeong, Dahyeon, Kumar, Naresh, Robinson, Jonathan M., Spearot, Alan
Format: Working Paper
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099328207202220249/IDU1d73051aa141f71445619b6f18a510d510c67
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/37732
id okr-10986-37732
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-377322022-07-22T05:10:36Z Private But Misunderstood? : Evidence on Measuring Intimate Partner Violence via Self-Interviewing in Rural Liberia and Malawi Park, David Sungho Aggarwal, Shilpa Jeong, Dahyeon Kumar, Naresh Robinson, Jonathan M. Spearot, Alan INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE (IPV) SURVEY METHODOLOGY SELF-INTERVIEW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SENSITIVE INFORMATION DOMESTIC ABUSE VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN SEXUAL CRIME SELF-INTERVIEW ANOMALIES Women may under-report intimate partner violence (IPV) due to several social and psychological factors. This study conducts a measurement experiment in rural Liberia and Malawi in which women were asked IPV questions via self-interviewing (SI) or face-to-face interviewing. About a third of women incorrectly answer basic screening questions in SI, and SI generates placebo effects on innocuous questions even for those who “pass” screening. Because the probability of responding “yes” to any specific IPV question is less than 50 percent, and that IPV is typically reported as an index (reporting yes to at least one question), such misunderstanding increases IPV reporting. In Malawi, SI increases the reported incidence of any type of IPV by 13 percentage points on a base of 20 percent; in Liberia, the study finds an insignificant increase of 4 percentage points on a base of 38 percent. Our results suggest SI may spuriously increase reported IPV rates. 2022-07-21T13:24:37Z 2022-07-21T13:24:37Z 2022-07 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099328207202220249/IDU1d73051aa141f71445619b6f18a510d510c67 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/37732 English Policy Research Working Paper;10124 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research Malawi
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE (IPV)
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
SELF-INTERVIEW
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
SENSITIVE INFORMATION
DOMESTIC ABUSE
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
SEXUAL CRIME
SELF-INTERVIEW ANOMALIES
spellingShingle INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE (IPV)
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
SELF-INTERVIEW
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
SENSITIVE INFORMATION
DOMESTIC ABUSE
VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
SEXUAL CRIME
SELF-INTERVIEW ANOMALIES
Park, David Sungho
Aggarwal, Shilpa
Jeong, Dahyeon
Kumar, Naresh
Robinson, Jonathan M.
Spearot, Alan
Private But Misunderstood? : Evidence on Measuring Intimate Partner Violence via Self-Interviewing in Rural Liberia and Malawi
geographic_facet Malawi
relation Policy Research Working Paper;10124
description Women may under-report intimate partner violence (IPV) due to several social and psychological factors. This study conducts a measurement experiment in rural Liberia and Malawi in which women were asked IPV questions via self-interviewing (SI) or face-to-face interviewing. About a third of women incorrectly answer basic screening questions in SI, and SI generates placebo effects on innocuous questions even for those who “pass” screening. Because the probability of responding “yes” to any specific IPV question is less than 50 percent, and that IPV is typically reported as an index (reporting yes to at least one question), such misunderstanding increases IPV reporting. In Malawi, SI increases the reported incidence of any type of IPV by 13 percentage points on a base of 20 percent; in Liberia, the study finds an insignificant increase of 4 percentage points on a base of 38 percent. Our results suggest SI may spuriously increase reported IPV rates.
format Working Paper
author Park, David Sungho
Aggarwal, Shilpa
Jeong, Dahyeon
Kumar, Naresh
Robinson, Jonathan M.
Spearot, Alan
author_facet Park, David Sungho
Aggarwal, Shilpa
Jeong, Dahyeon
Kumar, Naresh
Robinson, Jonathan M.
Spearot, Alan
author_sort Park, David Sungho
title Private But Misunderstood? : Evidence on Measuring Intimate Partner Violence via Self-Interviewing in Rural Liberia and Malawi
title_short Private But Misunderstood? : Evidence on Measuring Intimate Partner Violence via Self-Interviewing in Rural Liberia and Malawi
title_full Private But Misunderstood? : Evidence on Measuring Intimate Partner Violence via Self-Interviewing in Rural Liberia and Malawi
title_fullStr Private But Misunderstood? : Evidence on Measuring Intimate Partner Violence via Self-Interviewing in Rural Liberia and Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Private But Misunderstood? : Evidence on Measuring Intimate Partner Violence via Self-Interviewing in Rural Liberia and Malawi
title_sort private but misunderstood? : evidence on measuring intimate partner violence via self-interviewing in rural liberia and malawi
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2022
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099328207202220249/IDU1d73051aa141f71445619b6f18a510d510c67
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/37732
_version_ 1764487804540157952