Humanitarian and Social Protection Linkages with Examples from South Asia
Traditionally social protection (SP) and humanitarian programs were quite distinct in their objectives, scope, and operations, but over time those distinctions have diminished and with that the gains from better integration. Humanitarian programs a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099230005022242074/P175865085c27900c08bc50ee4676c3309b http://hdl.handle.net/10986/37442 |
id |
okr-10986-37442 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-374422022-05-17T05:10:36Z Humanitarian and Social Protection Linkages with Examples from South Asia Jorgensen, Steen Lau Ceretti, Maria Virginia AID EFFECTIVENESS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE OBJECTIVES SOCIAL PROTECTION OBJECTIVES RESILIENCE ADAPTIVE SP ADAPTIVE SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHOCK PREVENTION RISK MITIGATION SOCIAL MANAGEMENT OF RISK HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH Traditionally social protection (SP) and humanitarian programs were quite distinct in their objectives, scope, and operations, but over time those distinctions have diminished and with that the gains from better integration. Humanitarian programs are committed to more involvement of national actors, more use of cash, and greater popular participation all matters that are important for SP actors. On the other side, SP has gradually shifted into shock-responsive or adaptive SP that explicitly targets not only the poor but also those affected by shocks. Beyond presenting the divide and overlap of concepts, principles, and commitments from the SP and humanitarian realms, this paper attempts at unbundling a framework for humanitarian and SP integration across the delivery chain (based on the paper by Seyfert et al. 2019). Global experiences across the integration spectrum, as well as the practical application of the framework in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, are exemplified. The analysis shows how programs apply a ‘mix and match’ approach building on factors such as political will, technical capacity, and alignment of objectives across implementing agencies, donors, and the government. The paper identifies constraints and opportunities for better integration and proposes a set of actions to enhance benefits for affected populations. 2022-05-16T19:56:30Z 2022-05-16T19:56:30Z 2022 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099230005022242074/P175865085c27900c08bc50ee4676c3309b http://hdl.handle.net/10986/37442 English Social Protection & Jobs Discussion Paper;2204 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Working Paper (Numbered Series) Publications & Research South Asia |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English |
topic |
AID EFFECTIVENESS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE OBJECTIVES SOCIAL PROTECTION OBJECTIVES RESILIENCE ADAPTIVE SP ADAPTIVE SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHOCK PREVENTION RISK MITIGATION SOCIAL MANAGEMENT OF RISK HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH |
spellingShingle |
AID EFFECTIVENESS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE OBJECTIVES SOCIAL PROTECTION OBJECTIVES RESILIENCE ADAPTIVE SP ADAPTIVE SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEMS SHOCK PREVENTION RISK MITIGATION SOCIAL MANAGEMENT OF RISK HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH Jorgensen, Steen Lau Ceretti, Maria Virginia Humanitarian and Social Protection Linkages with Examples from South Asia |
geographic_facet |
South Asia |
relation |
Social Protection & Jobs Discussion Paper;2204 |
description |
Traditionally social protection (SP)
and humanitarian programs were quite distinct in their
objectives, scope, and operations, but over time those
distinctions have diminished and with that the gains from
better integration. Humanitarian programs are committed to
more involvement of national actors, more use of cash, and
greater popular participation all matters that are important
for SP actors. On the other side, SP has gradually shifted
into shock-responsive or adaptive SP that explicitly targets
not only the poor but also those affected by shocks. Beyond
presenting the divide and overlap of concepts, principles,
and commitments from the SP and humanitarian realms, this
paper attempts at unbundling a framework for humanitarian
and SP integration across the delivery chain (based on the
paper by Seyfert et al. 2019). Global experiences across the
integration spectrum, as well as the practical application
of the framework in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan,
are exemplified. The analysis shows how programs apply a
‘mix and match’ approach building on factors such as
political will, technical capacity, and alignment of
objectives across implementing agencies, donors, and the
government. The paper identifies constraints and
opportunities for better integration and proposes a set of
actions to enhance benefits for affected populations. |
format |
Working Paper |
author |
Jorgensen, Steen Lau Ceretti, Maria Virginia |
author_facet |
Jorgensen, Steen Lau Ceretti, Maria Virginia |
author_sort |
Jorgensen, Steen Lau |
title |
Humanitarian and Social Protection Linkages with Examples from South Asia |
title_short |
Humanitarian and Social Protection Linkages with Examples from South Asia |
title_full |
Humanitarian and Social Protection Linkages with Examples from South Asia |
title_fullStr |
Humanitarian and Social Protection Linkages with Examples from South Asia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Humanitarian and Social Protection Linkages with Examples from South Asia |
title_sort |
humanitarian and social protection linkages with examples from south asia |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099230005022242074/P175865085c27900c08bc50ee4676c3309b http://hdl.handle.net/10986/37442 |
_version_ |
1764487167318425600 |