Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay

This paper provides a comparative analysis of five countries which have sought to institutionalize government-wide monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems. Among the many lessons are the strong advantages of having high-level support, and the benefits of coordination among different stakeholders...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zaltsman, Ariel
Format: Evaluation
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/399731468126575141/Evaluation-capacity-development-experience-with-institutionalizing-monitoring-and-evaluation-systems-in-five-Latin-American-countries
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36699
id okr-10986-36699
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-366992021-12-10T05:10:53Z Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay Zaltsman, Ariel MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM BUDGET ALLOCATION PROCESS NATIONAL BUDGET LAW PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CONTROL NATIONAL STRATEGIC PRIORITY PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM MINISTERIAL RESOLUTION PRIMARY CONCERN ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ENHANCING TRANSPARENCY EXTERNAL MONITORING COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS POLITICAL AUTHORITY INFORMATION FLOW MASS MEDIA MACROECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM KNOWLEDGE PROGRAM CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT EXTERNAL FACTOR PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS INSTITUTIONAL INCENTIVE SELECTION CRITERION PUBLIC RESOURCE This paper provides a comparative analysis of five countries which have sought to institutionalize government-wide monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems. Among the many lessons are the strong advantages of having high-level support, and the benefits of coordination among different stakeholders and systems. A number of strong features of Chile’s main M&E system are also noted. 2021-12-09T14:06:29Z 2021-12-09T14:06:29Z 2006-05 Evaluation http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/399731468126575141/Evaluation-capacity-development-experience-with-institutionalizing-monitoring-and-evaluation-systems-in-five-Latin-American-countries http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36699 English en_US ECD Working Paper Series;No.16 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Latin America & Caribbean Latin America Argentina Chile Colombia Costa Rica Uruguay
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
BUDGET ALLOCATION PROCESS
NATIONAL BUDGET LAW
PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT CONTROL
NATIONAL STRATEGIC PRIORITY
PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM
MINISTERIAL RESOLUTION
PRIMARY CONCERN
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
ENHANCING TRANSPARENCY
EXTERNAL MONITORING
COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
POLITICAL AUTHORITY
INFORMATION FLOW
MASS MEDIA
MACROECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM
KNOWLEDGE PROGRAM
CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT
EXTERNAL FACTOR
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS
INSTITUTIONAL INCENTIVE
SELECTION CRITERION
PUBLIC RESOURCE
spellingShingle MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
BUDGET ALLOCATION PROCESS
NATIONAL BUDGET LAW
PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT CONTROL
NATIONAL STRATEGIC PRIORITY
PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM
MINISTERIAL RESOLUTION
PRIMARY CONCERN
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
ENHANCING TRANSPARENCY
EXTERNAL MONITORING
COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
POLITICAL AUTHORITY
INFORMATION FLOW
MASS MEDIA
MACROECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM
KNOWLEDGE PROGRAM
CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT
EXTERNAL FACTOR
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS
INSTITUTIONAL INCENTIVE
SELECTION CRITERION
PUBLIC RESOURCE
Zaltsman, Ariel
Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay
geographic_facet Latin America & Caribbean
Latin America
Argentina
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Uruguay
relation ECD Working Paper Series;No.16
description This paper provides a comparative analysis of five countries which have sought to institutionalize government-wide monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems. Among the many lessons are the strong advantages of having high-level support, and the benefits of coordination among different stakeholders and systems. A number of strong features of Chile’s main M&E system are also noted.
format Evaluation
author Zaltsman, Ariel
author_facet Zaltsman, Ariel
author_sort Zaltsman, Ariel
title Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay
title_short Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay
title_full Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay
title_fullStr Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay
title_full_unstemmed Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay
title_sort experience with institutionalizing monitoring and evaluation systems in five latin american countries : argentina, chile, colombia, costa rica and uruguay
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2021
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/399731468126575141/Evaluation-capacity-development-experience-with-institutionalizing-monitoring-and-evaluation-systems-in-five-Latin-American-countries
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36699
_version_ 1764484576620576768