Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay
This paper provides a comparative analysis of five countries which have sought to institutionalize government-wide monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems. Among the many lessons are the strong advantages of having high-level support, and the benefits of coordination among different stakeholders...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Evaluation |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/399731468126575141/Evaluation-capacity-development-experience-with-institutionalizing-monitoring-and-evaluation-systems-in-five-Latin-American-countries http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36699 |
id |
okr-10986-36699 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-366992021-12-10T05:10:53Z Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay Zaltsman, Ariel MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM BUDGET ALLOCATION PROCESS NATIONAL BUDGET LAW PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CONTROL NATIONAL STRATEGIC PRIORITY PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM MINISTERIAL RESOLUTION PRIMARY CONCERN ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ENHANCING TRANSPARENCY EXTERNAL MONITORING COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS POLITICAL AUTHORITY INFORMATION FLOW MASS MEDIA MACROECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM KNOWLEDGE PROGRAM CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT EXTERNAL FACTOR PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS INSTITUTIONAL INCENTIVE SELECTION CRITERION PUBLIC RESOURCE This paper provides a comparative analysis of five countries which have sought to institutionalize government-wide monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems. Among the many lessons are the strong advantages of having high-level support, and the benefits of coordination among different stakeholders and systems. A number of strong features of Chile’s main M&E system are also noted. 2021-12-09T14:06:29Z 2021-12-09T14:06:29Z 2006-05 Evaluation http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/399731468126575141/Evaluation-capacity-development-experience-with-institutionalizing-monitoring-and-evaluation-systems-in-five-Latin-American-countries http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36699 English en_US ECD Working Paper Series;No.16 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Latin America & Caribbean Latin America Argentina Chile Colombia Costa Rica Uruguay |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English en_US |
topic |
MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM BUDGET ALLOCATION PROCESS NATIONAL BUDGET LAW PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CONTROL NATIONAL STRATEGIC PRIORITY PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM MINISTERIAL RESOLUTION PRIMARY CONCERN ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ENHANCING TRANSPARENCY EXTERNAL MONITORING COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS POLITICAL AUTHORITY INFORMATION FLOW MASS MEDIA MACROECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM KNOWLEDGE PROGRAM CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT EXTERNAL FACTOR PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS INSTITUTIONAL INCENTIVE SELECTION CRITERION PUBLIC RESOURCE |
spellingShingle |
MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM BUDGET ALLOCATION PROCESS NATIONAL BUDGET LAW PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CONTROL NATIONAL STRATEGIC PRIORITY PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM MINISTERIAL RESOLUTION PRIMARY CONCERN ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ENHANCING TRANSPARENCY EXTERNAL MONITORING COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS POLITICAL AUTHORITY INFORMATION FLOW MASS MEDIA MACROECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM KNOWLEDGE PROGRAM CONTINUOUS ASSESSMENT EXTERNAL FACTOR PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS INSTITUTIONAL INCENTIVE SELECTION CRITERION PUBLIC RESOURCE Zaltsman, Ariel Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay |
geographic_facet |
Latin America & Caribbean Latin America Argentina Chile Colombia Costa Rica Uruguay |
relation |
ECD Working Paper Series;No.16 |
description |
This paper provides a comparative analysis of five countries which have sought to institutionalize government-wide monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems. Among the many lessons are the strong advantages of having high-level support, and the benefits of coordination among different stakeholders and systems. A number of strong features of Chile’s main M&E system are also noted. |
format |
Evaluation |
author |
Zaltsman, Ariel |
author_facet |
Zaltsman, Ariel |
author_sort |
Zaltsman, Ariel |
title |
Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay |
title_short |
Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay |
title_full |
Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay |
title_fullStr |
Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay |
title_full_unstemmed |
Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Five Latin American Countries : Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay |
title_sort |
experience with institutionalizing monitoring and evaluation systems in five latin american countries : argentina, chile, colombia, costa rica and uruguay |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/399731468126575141/Evaluation-capacity-development-experience-with-institutionalizing-monitoring-and-evaluation-systems-in-five-Latin-American-countries http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36699 |
_version_ |
1764484576620576768 |