Should Cash Transfers Be Confined to the Poor? Implications for Poverty and Inequality in Latin America
This paper compares for 13 Latin American countries the poverty and inequality impacts of cash transfer programs that are given to all children and the elderly (that is, "categorical" transfers), to programs of equal budget that are confi...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000158349_20111108083448 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/3642 |
Summary: | This paper compares for 13 Latin
American countries the poverty and inequality impacts of
cash transfer programs that are given to all children and
the elderly (that is, "categorical" transfers), to
programs of equal budget that are confined to the poor
within each population group (that is, "poverty
targeted" transfers). The analysis finds that both the
incidence of poverty and the depth of the poverty gap are
important factors affecting the relative effectiveness of
categorical versus poverty targeted transfers. The
comparison of transfers to children and the elderly also
supports the view that choosing carefully categories of
beneficiaries is almost as important as targeting the poor
for achieving a high poverty and inequality impact. Overall,
the findings suggest that although in the Latin American
context poverty targeting tends to deliver higher poverty
impacts, there are circumstances under which categorical
targeting confined to geographical regions (sometimes called
"geographic targeting") may be a valid option to
consider. This is particularly the case in low-income
countries with widespread pockets of poverty. |
---|