Lives versus Livelihoods during the COVID-19 Pandemic : How Testing Softens the Trade-off

The early COVID-19 pandemic literature focused on the conflict between lives and livelihoods. But cross-country evidence reveals that across countries high mortality rates were often associated with large gross domestic product contractions. This p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Islamaj, Ergys, Le, Duong Trung, Mattoo, Aaditya
Format: Working Paper
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/637661623359741565/Lives-versus-Livelihoods-during-the-COVID-19-Pandemic-How-Testing-Softens-the-Trade-off
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/35766
id okr-10986-35766
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-357662021-06-18T05:10:55Z Lives versus Livelihoods during the COVID-19 Pandemic : How Testing Softens the Trade-off Islamaj, Ergys Le, Duong Trung Mattoo, Aaditya CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PANDEMIC IMPACT LOCKDOWN TESTING LIVELIHOODS INCOME LOSS FATALITY RATE The early COVID-19 pandemic literature focused on the conflict between lives and livelihoods. But cross-country evidence reveals that across countries high mortality rates were often associated with large gross domestic product contractions. This paper shows that the presumed trade-off was associated with lockdowns as the primary instrument of containment. Early transition from lockdowns to testing-tracing-isolation-based containment softened the trade-off within countries and explains the absence of a trade-off across countries. The analysis finds that testing had positive indirect effects on growth and perhaps even positive direct effects. By allowing countries to relax shutdowns without compromising on containment, testing could have indirectly contributed to about a 0.6 percentage point boost in growth. By infusing greater confidence in people to step out and engage in economic activity, testing could have added another 0.6 percentage point to growth. As the world struggles to scale up vaccination in the face of new waves and variants, continued emphasis on testing could help limit infection without recourse to costly lockdowns. 2021-06-17T16:13:19Z 2021-06-17T16:13:19Z 2021-06 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/637661623359741565/Lives-versus-Livelihoods-during-the-COVID-19-Pandemic-How-Testing-Softens-the-Trade-off http://hdl.handle.net/10986/35766 English Policy Research Working Paper;No. 9696 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper East Asia and Pacific East Asia Oceania
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic CORONAVIRUS
COVID-19
PANDEMIC IMPACT
LOCKDOWN
TESTING
LIVELIHOODS
INCOME LOSS
FATALITY RATE
spellingShingle CORONAVIRUS
COVID-19
PANDEMIC IMPACT
LOCKDOWN
TESTING
LIVELIHOODS
INCOME LOSS
FATALITY RATE
Islamaj, Ergys
Le, Duong Trung
Mattoo, Aaditya
Lives versus Livelihoods during the COVID-19 Pandemic : How Testing Softens the Trade-off
geographic_facet East Asia and Pacific
East Asia
Oceania
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 9696
description The early COVID-19 pandemic literature focused on the conflict between lives and livelihoods. But cross-country evidence reveals that across countries high mortality rates were often associated with large gross domestic product contractions. This paper shows that the presumed trade-off was associated with lockdowns as the primary instrument of containment. Early transition from lockdowns to testing-tracing-isolation-based containment softened the trade-off within countries and explains the absence of a trade-off across countries. The analysis finds that testing had positive indirect effects on growth and perhaps even positive direct effects. By allowing countries to relax shutdowns without compromising on containment, testing could have indirectly contributed to about a 0.6 percentage point boost in growth. By infusing greater confidence in people to step out and engage in economic activity, testing could have added another 0.6 percentage point to growth. As the world struggles to scale up vaccination in the face of new waves and variants, continued emphasis on testing could help limit infection without recourse to costly lockdowns.
format Working Paper
author Islamaj, Ergys
Le, Duong Trung
Mattoo, Aaditya
author_facet Islamaj, Ergys
Le, Duong Trung
Mattoo, Aaditya
author_sort Islamaj, Ergys
title Lives versus Livelihoods during the COVID-19 Pandemic : How Testing Softens the Trade-off
title_short Lives versus Livelihoods during the COVID-19 Pandemic : How Testing Softens the Trade-off
title_full Lives versus Livelihoods during the COVID-19 Pandemic : How Testing Softens the Trade-off
title_fullStr Lives versus Livelihoods during the COVID-19 Pandemic : How Testing Softens the Trade-off
title_full_unstemmed Lives versus Livelihoods during the COVID-19 Pandemic : How Testing Softens the Trade-off
title_sort lives versus livelihoods during the covid-19 pandemic : how testing softens the trade-off
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2021
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/637661623359741565/Lives-versus-Livelihoods-during-the-COVID-19-Pandemic-How-Testing-Softens-the-Trade-off
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/35766
_version_ 1764483732550451200