Rwanda Nutrition Expenditure and Institutional Review 2020

This report provides recommendations to further develop the methodology for nutrition expenditure analysis. This report carefully reviewed all available nutrition expenditure analyses available and drew methodological conclusions. Findings include...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Piatti-Fünfkirchen, Moritz, Liang, Liying, Akuoku, Jonathan Kweku, Mwitende, Patrice
Format:	Report
Language:	English
Published:	World Bank, Washington, DC 2020
Subjects:	MALNUTRITION NUTRITION EXPENDITURE GOVERNMENT SPENDING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE NUTRITION POLICY PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Online Access:	http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/588131604469825169/Rwanda-Nutrition-Expenditure-and-Institutional-Review-2020 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34751

id	okr-10986-34751
recordtype	oai_dc
spelling	okr-10986-347512021-06-14T09:55:22Z Rwanda Nutrition Expenditure and Institutional Review 2020 Piatti-Fünfkirchen, Moritz Liang, Liying Akuoku, Jonathan Kweku Mwitende, Patrice MALNUTRITION NUTRITION EXPENDITURE GOVERNMENT SPENDING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE NUTRITION POLICY PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT This report provides recommendations to further develop the methodology for nutrition expenditure analysis. This report carefully reviewed all available nutrition expenditure analyses available and drew methodological conclusions. Findings include a need for a standardized way of classifying nutrition-related spending to be applied, of which the 2013 Lancet Framework lends itself well. Government spending should be mapped against this framework to the extent possible. Government expenditure data as available from the FMIS should be used. Coding for nutrition should be done against activity descriptions in the budget. Merely looking at spending agencies or programs/subprograms is unlikely to be sufficiently precise to be helpful for an analysis and should only be used if the former not be available. Weighting nutrition spending tends to be subjective and should not be used for comparison. It is important to consider the adequacy of the institutional and public financial management environment. This can provide for actionable recommendations on how to improve the management of nutrition across governments, strengthen accountability, and help adjust spending toward high impact interventions. Optima can be used to inform allocative efficiency. It should however be interpreted with care if the unit cost estimates cannot be fully derived from Government and donor expenditure reports of all high impact interventions. 2020-11-09T19:59:51Z 2020-11-09T19:59:51Z 2020-11-03 Report http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/588131604469825169/Rwanda-Nutrition-Expenditure-and-Institutional-Review-2020 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34751 English CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work Economic & Sector Work :: Other Health Study Africa Rwanda
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Foreign Institution
institution	Digital Repositories
building	World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection	World Bank
language	English
topic	MALNUTRITION NUTRITION EXPENDITURE GOVERNMENT SPENDING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE NUTRITION POLICY PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
spellingShingle	MALNUTRITION NUTRITION EXPENDITURE GOVERNMENT SPENDING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE NUTRITION POLICY PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Piatti-Fünfkirchen, Moritz Liang, Liying Akuoku, Jonathan Kweku Mwitende, Patrice Rwanda Nutrition Expenditure and Institutional Review 2020
geographic_facet	Africa Rwanda
description	This report provides recommendations to further develop the methodology for nutrition expenditure analysis. This report carefully reviewed all available nutrition expenditure analyses available and drew methodological conclusions. Findings include a need for a standardized way of classifying nutrition-related spending to be applied, of which the 2013 Lancet Framework lends itself well. Government spending should be mapped against this framework to the extent possible. Government expenditure data as available from the FMIS should be used. Coding for nutrition should be done against activity descriptions in the budget. Merely looking at spending agencies or programs/subprograms is unlikely to be sufficiently precise to be helpful for an analysis and should only be used if the former not be available. Weighting nutrition spending tends to be subjective and should not be used for comparison. It is important to consider the adequacy of the institutional and public financial management environment. This can provide for actionable recommendations on how to improve the management of nutrition across governments, strengthen accountability, and help adjust spending toward high impact interventions. Optima can be used to inform allocative efficiency. It should however be interpreted with care if the unit cost estimates cannot be fully derived from Government and donor expenditure reports of all high impact interventions.
format	Report
author	Piatti-Fünfkirchen, Moritz Liang, Liying Akuoku, Jonathan Kweku Mwitende, Patrice
author_facet	Piatti-Fünfkirchen, Moritz Liang, Liying Akuoku, Jonathan Kweku Mwitende, Patrice
author_sort	Piatti-Fünfkirchen, Moritz
title	Rwanda Nutrition Expenditure and Institutional Review 2020
title_short	Rwanda Nutrition Expenditure and Institutional Review 2020
title_full	Rwanda Nutrition Expenditure and Institutional Review 2020
title_fullStr	Rwanda Nutrition Expenditure and Institutional Review 2020
title_full_unstemmed	Rwanda Nutrition Expenditure and Institutional Review 2020
title_sort	rwanda nutrition expenditure and institutional review 2020
publisher	World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate	2020
url	http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/588131604469825169/Rwanda-Nutrition-Expenditure-and-Institutional-Review-2020 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/34751
_version_	1764481578629595136

Rwanda Nutrition Expenditure and Institutional Review 2020

Similar Items