Benefits of Joint Land Titling in Vietnam

The study assesses the impact of different types of land use rights certificates (LURC) on individual and household welfare, expanding on the previous research of Menon, Rodgers, and Kennedy (2016), which assessed the effects of LURCs on agricultur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Buchhave, Helle, Nguyen, Viet Cuong, Nguyen, Tam Giang, Pham, Thi Mong Hoa
Format: Policy Note
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Hanoi 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/607331585844726892/Benefits-of-Joint-Land-Titling-in-Vietnam
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/33546
id okr-10986-33546
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-335462021-05-25T09:35:04Z Benefits of Joint Land Titling in Vietnam Buchhave, Helle Nguyen, Viet Cuong Nguyen, Tam Giang Pham, Thi Mong Hoa GENDER LAND TITLING PROPERTY RIGHTS EQUALITY LAND USE JOINT TITLING The study assesses the impact of different types of land use rights certificates (LURC) on individual and household welfare, expanding on the previous research of Menon, Rodgers, and Kennedy (2016), which assessed the effects of LURCs on agricultural land on household welfare. This study considers more recent data from the Vietnam Household Living Standards Survey (VHLSS) of 2014 in addition to VHLSS data from 2002–08 and includes an analysis of LURCs for agricultural as well as residential land. The study findings are presented below in three sections. The first is an analysis of land use and LURC distribution trends based on the VHLSS data. The second draws on a group of impact evaluations that compares the effects of having different types of LURCs. We regress individuals' employment and health care outcomes on whether their name was included on a LURC. The treatment variables are whether one has been issued an agricultural or residential LURC, with controls for age, education, ethnicity, urban residence, household consumption, land area, and district. We also regress household-level outcomes—expenditures, credit levels, and incomes—on whether the household's LURC is singly or jointly titled. Notably, the distribution of LURCs is not randomized, making it difficult to estimate the causal effects of LURC status and thereby limiting the conclusions that can be drawn. The third section, using 2014 demographic data and LURC distributions, offers a cost-benefit analysis of efforts to convert and reissue all remaining singly titled LURCs to jointly titled ones. We estimate the benefit as the impact difference between single- and jointly titled LURCs as calculated in the impact evaluation section and estimate costs as those of reissuing a LURC. 2020-04-08T16:03:07Z 2020-04-08T16:03:07Z 2020-03-29 Policy Note http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/607331585844726892/Benefits-of-Joint-Land-Titling-in-Vietnam http://hdl.handle.net/10986/33546 English CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Hanoi Economic & Sector Work Economic & Sector Work :: Policy Note East Asia and Pacific Vietnam
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic GENDER
LAND TITLING
PROPERTY RIGHTS
EQUALITY
LAND USE
JOINT TITLING
spellingShingle GENDER
LAND TITLING
PROPERTY RIGHTS
EQUALITY
LAND USE
JOINT TITLING
Buchhave, Helle
Nguyen, Viet Cuong
Nguyen, Tam Giang
Pham, Thi Mong Hoa
Benefits of Joint Land Titling in Vietnam
geographic_facet East Asia and Pacific
Vietnam
description The study assesses the impact of different types of land use rights certificates (LURC) on individual and household welfare, expanding on the previous research of Menon, Rodgers, and Kennedy (2016), which assessed the effects of LURCs on agricultural land on household welfare. This study considers more recent data from the Vietnam Household Living Standards Survey (VHLSS) of 2014 in addition to VHLSS data from 2002–08 and includes an analysis of LURCs for agricultural as well as residential land. The study findings are presented below in three sections. The first is an analysis of land use and LURC distribution trends based on the VHLSS data. The second draws on a group of impact evaluations that compares the effects of having different types of LURCs. We regress individuals' employment and health care outcomes on whether their name was included on a LURC. The treatment variables are whether one has been issued an agricultural or residential LURC, with controls for age, education, ethnicity, urban residence, household consumption, land area, and district. We also regress household-level outcomes—expenditures, credit levels, and incomes—on whether the household's LURC is singly or jointly titled. Notably, the distribution of LURCs is not randomized, making it difficult to estimate the causal effects of LURC status and thereby limiting the conclusions that can be drawn. The third section, using 2014 demographic data and LURC distributions, offers a cost-benefit analysis of efforts to convert and reissue all remaining singly titled LURCs to jointly titled ones. We estimate the benefit as the impact difference between single- and jointly titled LURCs as calculated in the impact evaluation section and estimate costs as those of reissuing a LURC.
format Policy Note
author Buchhave, Helle
Nguyen, Viet Cuong
Nguyen, Tam Giang
Pham, Thi Mong Hoa
author_facet Buchhave, Helle
Nguyen, Viet Cuong
Nguyen, Tam Giang
Pham, Thi Mong Hoa
author_sort Buchhave, Helle
title Benefits of Joint Land Titling in Vietnam
title_short Benefits of Joint Land Titling in Vietnam
title_full Benefits of Joint Land Titling in Vietnam
title_fullStr Benefits of Joint Land Titling in Vietnam
title_full_unstemmed Benefits of Joint Land Titling in Vietnam
title_sort benefits of joint land titling in vietnam
publisher World Bank, Hanoi
publishDate 2020
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/607331585844726892/Benefits-of-Joint-Land-Titling-in-Vietnam
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/33546
_version_ 1764479001686966272